[–]ninjajunkie0 points
2 points
2 points
(+2|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
Seems like a screwy classification system to give the appearance of so many confused. The only way the authors say you are not non-conforming or androgynous is if you say are extremely masculine or extremely feminine. So to make a tiny group look more mainstream, change the classification to include more of the majority.
Like how the census calls Mexicans white to skew the crime numbers. If there were really that many degenerates, the libtards wouldn't have to fight the right so hard. JMO
[–]11595119?0 points
3 points
3 points
(+3|-0)
ago
Yeah. And in a very liberal state anyone feeling extremely either way is going to be looked at as very out of the norm so lots of young people will not say they are that way. Kids really want to fit in with everyone else.
[–] ninjajunkie 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Seems like a screwy classification system to give the appearance of so many confused. The only way the authors say you are not non-conforming or androgynous is if you say are extremely masculine or extremely feminine. So to make a tiny group look more mainstream, change the classification to include more of the majority.
Like how the census calls Mexicans white to skew the crime numbers. If there were really that many degenerates, the libtards wouldn't have to fight the right so hard. JMO
[–] 11595119? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Yeah. And in a very liberal state anyone feeling extremely either way is going to be looked at as very out of the norm so lots of young people will not say they are that way. Kids really want to fit in with everyone else.