[–] millennial_vulcan 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago (edited ago)
NEVER FORGET that YOUTUBE CEO Susan Wojcicki is the SISTER of Anne Wojcicki, who is the EX-WIFE of Google Founder Sergey Brin
Happy Holidays!
[–] killercanuck 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
Youtube still has scat videos for children that are monetized and creepy men who comment on little girls uploaded videos(with their real name) that remain unbanned. Yet they use google ad-sense to censor paying advertisers and demonetize popular youtubers that most advertisers would be more than ok to advertise on. What the fuck youtube?
[–] doginventer 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The snake is defanged. Clue one is that there is no snagging as snake pulls away after strikes. Clue two is that the strikes are not painful for the baby. Clue three is the tone of the conversations in the background.
[–] DeathToMasonsASAP 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
It still seems unsettling to me, but good catch.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
[–] 123_456 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Have you never seen this video? It's old as heck. Well, anyway, the explanation. The baby is not being attacked. I mean, it is, but it's not in any danger. The cobra has had its mouth sewn shut. They put the cobra with the baby, so that it gets used to it, and isn't afraid when it grows up. The parents are snake charmers, so this is what they do.
[–] RageAgainstTheAmish 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
If it had fangs that child would be screaming
[–] derram 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
https://hooktube.com/watch?v=fqyY1MDFTec | https://hooktube.com/embed/fqyY1MDFTec :
indian baby sacrificed to a cobra - YouTube
[–] mollyzbrownpizza ago
you guys can relax, I reported it! That means that YouTube will surely take it down and take care of this 10 year old video of filth..
satire aside: don't care if the baby is sitting next to a cobra with no fangs or venom, it is CHILD ABUSE all the same. Instilling unnecessary fear in a child for your enjoyment is exploitation (aka: child abuse) and is scarring that baby for life. disgusting. and YouTube constantly censors anything they feel is against their political beliefs but leaves this crap up?!
[–] Kacey 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
I just had a post about "US taxpayers were made to pay millions of dollars in financial settlements for hundreds of incidents of Congressperson abuse, including gross sexual harassment, against interns, staff and office employees, of both sexes. " deleted for violating rule 1 because it was about sex with people who weren't children, even though it was about sex crimes by the elites. But this is still up. It is not about elites and it is not about pedophilia. What gives
[–] argosciv 1 point 7 points 8 points (+8|-1) ago (edited ago)
Wow... and I thought I lived under a rock...
People, this video is not only old as fuck, but, the child was in absolutely no danger. Getting up in arms over this, is facebook-level woftage.
I can only hope y'all are just trolling or something, otherwise, wow... just wow.
[–] Joe10jo 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Agree. The cobra’s been defanged or whatever.