0
0

[–] mollyzbrownpizza ago 

you guys can relax, I reported it! That means that YouTube will surely take it down and take care of this 10 year old video of filth..

satire aside: don't care if the baby is sitting next to a cobra with no fangs or venom, it is CHILD ABUSE all the same. Instilling unnecessary fear in a child for your enjoyment is exploitation (aka: child abuse) and is scarring that baby for life. disgusting. and YouTube constantly censors anything they feel is against their political beliefs but leaves this crap up?!

1
-1

[–] dtneslo [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Im guessing the down votes are from people who dont have kids....this is insane behaviour

[–] [deleted] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] dtneslo [S] ago 

You’re the one who sounds not well That video is Child Abuse....YouTube censors PG investigators but leaves this Satanic shit up along with all those other PG promoting channels...personal attacks just don’t help anything

1
7

[–] argosciv 1 point 7 points (+8|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Wow... and I thought I lived under a rock...

People, this video is not only old as fuck, but, the child was in absolutely no danger. Getting up in arms over this, is facebook-level woftage.

I can only hope y'all are just trolling or something, otherwise, wow... just wow.

0
1

[–] Joe10jo 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Agree. The cobra’s been defanged or whatever.

0
2

[–] doginventer 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The snake is defanged. Clue one is that there is no snagging as snake pulls away after strikes. Clue two is that the strikes are not painful for the baby. Clue three is the tone of the conversations in the background.

0
1

[–] DeathToMasonsASAP 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It still seems unsettling to me, but good catch.

2
0

[–] Kacey 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

I just had a post about "US taxpayers were made to pay millions of dollars in financial settlements for hundreds of incidents of Congressperson abuse, including gross sexual harassment, against interns, staff and office employees, of both sexes. " deleted for violating rule 1 because it was about sex with people who weren't children, even though it was about sex crimes by the elites. But this is still up. It is not about elites and it is not about pedophilia. What gives

0
1

[–] dtneslo [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It’s about corporate tolerance of child torture

0
6

[–] millennial_vulcan 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

NEVER FORGET that YOUTUBE CEO Susan Wojcicki is the SISTER of Anne Wojcicki, who is the EX-WIFE of Google Founder Sergey Brin

Happy Holidays!

link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Wojcicki

1
4

[–] Cheesebooger 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Its sounds like a bar mitzvah list

0
4

[–] killercanuck 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Youtube still has scat videos for children that are monetized and creepy men who comment on little girls uploaded videos(with their real name) that remain unbanned. Yet they use google ad-sense to censor paying advertisers and demonetize popular youtubers that most advertisers would be more than ok to advertise on. What the fuck youtube?

1
3

[–] realityisinsanity 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Google is satanic.

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)