1
7

[–] argosciv 1 point 7 points (+8|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Wow... and I thought I lived under a rock...

People, this video is not only old as fuck, but, the child was in absolutely no danger. Getting up in arms over this, is facebook-level woftage.

I can only hope y'all are just trolling or something, otherwise, wow... just wow.

0
1

[–] Joe10jo 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Agree. The cobra’s been defanged or whatever.

0
6

[–] millennial_vulcan 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

NEVER FORGET that YOUTUBE CEO Susan Wojcicki is the SISTER of Anne Wojcicki, who is the EX-WIFE of Google Founder Sergey Brin

Happy Holidays!

link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Wojcicki

1
4

[–] Cheesebooger 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Its sounds like a bar mitzvah list

2
0

[–] Kacey 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

I just had a post about "US taxpayers were made to pay millions of dollars in financial settlements for hundreds of incidents of Congressperson abuse, including gross sexual harassment, against interns, staff and office employees, of both sexes. " deleted for violating rule 1 because it was about sex with people who weren't children, even though it was about sex crimes by the elites. But this is still up. It is not about elites and it is not about pedophilia. What gives

0
1

[–] dtneslo [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It’s about corporate tolerance of child torture

2
0

[–] dtneslo [S] 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

This Is A Sign Of The End Times....

0
4

[–] killercanuck 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Youtube still has scat videos for children that are monetized and creepy men who comment on little girls uploaded videos(with their real name) that remain unbanned. Yet they use google ad-sense to censor paying advertisers and demonetize popular youtubers that most advertisers would be more than ok to advertise on. What the fuck youtube?

1
3

[–] realityisinsanity 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Google is satanic.

0
2

[–] doginventer 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The snake is defanged. Clue one is that there is no snagging as snake pulls away after strikes. Clue two is that the strikes are not painful for the baby. Clue three is the tone of the conversations in the background.

0
1

[–] DeathToMasonsASAP 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It still seems unsettling to me, but good catch.

0
0

[–] realityisinsanity ago 

I recall seeing this several years ago.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
4

[–] Num83rGuy 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

It's from India or some other shit hole near there.

The Cobra has been de-fanged so it's not much they to the child if that is any consolation.

1
0

[–] argosciv 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Calm down, there's absolutely no need to report this video. I get that it's easy to misinterpret this if watched with pizzagate goggles on, but, the video is indeed many years old and the child was in absolutely no danger due to the snake being defanged. No hostility intended by me, by the way, just sharing my 2c.

0
3

[–] 123_456 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Have you never seen this video? It's old as heck. Well, anyway, the explanation. The baby is not being attacked. I mean, it is, but it's not in any danger. The cobra has had its mouth sewn shut. They put the cobra with the baby, so that it gets used to it, and isn't afraid when it grows up. The parents are snake charmers, so this is what they do.

0
2

[–] RageAgainstTheAmish 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

If it had fangs that child would be screaming

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)