[–] Arrvee 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
Crap, get an editor.
Before and after the 2016 election.
Sentence fragment. The fragment is not tied to a noun, an "it".
And it remains ongoing.
And my English teachers strongly discourage opening a sentence with "And" or "But".
The Deep State caretakers involved are familiar names: James Comey (FBI), John Brennan (CIA),... (etc)
Saying "Deep State" is a normie turnoff. They've seen way too much drug-inspired transparent bullshit talking about the "Deep State" and they're going to assume that this is more of the same when the hostile-controlled NYT and WaPo are not reporting this and the site they've never heard of calls itself "True Pundit" which sounds like "Honest Bob's Used Car Shop" to normies.
More importantly, it may be a factual error. The people named are the most visible public figures of the government. The Deep State is Deep because it is hidden from the surface. It may be incorrect to call them Deep State when they are the most well known figures of the formal state.
per intelligence gleaned form
Spell check would not have caught that one, but an editor might have.
Bharara could not be reached for comment and did not respond the a Twitter inquiry
Dickhead bloggers consider a Twitter inquiry a suitable opportunity to respond. Real journalists use a telephone if they cannot meet the subject in person.
Veselnitskaya may have been paid as well by the U.S. government, FBI sources said.
But the sources had no grounds to believe this or else the article would have mentioned it.
almost a year before the 2016 election. The targets then were Flynn and Page, sources confirmed.
The context is missing. Flynn was meeting with the Russians. Page may have been doing the same, given that he had suspicious dealings with Rosneft while he worked for Trump. Manafort had dealings with Russia. Wiretapping them was normal procedure since they were in contact with a foreign power.
Little mistakes like this throw a report into question. If the writers didn't put in the effort to get the grammar right, what mistakes slid through in the actual reporting? People notice.
[–] TheInquisition 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
^ Can't wrap their head around that spying on a political opponent is a huge crime so they have to attack the grammar of the article. Arrvee, look up Watergate.
We need normies to believe it to generate the political will to drain the swamp. A good presentation is necessary for normies to believe it. If the presentation is fucked, normies will be disinclined to believe it or anything else the site publishes in the future. People pick up on these little things.
Have you studied MSM propaganda? They print blatant lies, but the presentation is excellent. Their grammar is fine, their sources have authoritative titles, and a dozen similar reports are published in different outlets in the same week. It looks professional, so people trust it. We need to look professional.
[–] undertheshills 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Alex Jones talked about this a year ago.
[–] llegendary 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Continuing with the charade AFTER he was President = treason.
[–] SJWs_R_FAAAGS ago
So what will come of this....
[–] 11371147? [S] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
I think the NSA part is being taken care of by Admiral Rogers, who went outside the chain-of-command (perhaps you remember how upset the MSM was about that!) to let Trump know about this spying. After watching Rosenstein's testimony the other day, though, I do think we are going to see a public shake-up with the release of the Office of the Inspector General's report, which has apparently swelled to 1.2 million documents concerning the politicization of the FBI and DOJ. There is no deadline on when the report has to be concluded, but the 1.2 million documents were promised to the oversight committee by January 15th, 2018. On the other hand, a few news outlets are reporting inside information daily, which can drive the narrative and push the action. Eventually, what I want to come of this, is justice. It remains to be seen and skepticism is warranted, but it feels like we are closer than we have been in a long time.
[–] guinness2 1 point 7 points 8 points (+8|-1) ago (edited ago)
The optics of hanging our first black president (for treason) is gonna be hilarious.
[–] ChippyTubes 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
These are the REAL people interfering in US elections, the BBC pedo wood types and Piers Morgan etc the Saudis, Iranians, muslim brotherhood etc The Jewish, why does nobody talk about the Israeli lobby?
[–] guinness2 1 point 7 points 8 points (+8|-1) ago
Honestly, it would be foolish to do now because the normies would have none of it because of generations of indoctrination about it's acceptable to question the POTUS or the Moon landing or Jesus or the Buddha, but antisemitism is not acceptable. They believe anyone who disagrees with a Jew deserves to be locked in a prison cage... as if Jews are our perfect overlords.
The timing must be chosen carefully... when we have definitive proof of an event that the normies can both comprehend and accept... and then their minds must be gradually expended over time... so they can eventually comprehend that Jews are our enemy.
Notice how much effort it's taken for President Trump to disarm the Jew's most powerful weapon: the mainstream media? This is gonna take time because we are forced to move as fast as most of our slowest citizens.
[–] Monsantos_Schlong ago
Mainly because they don't want to die.
[–] Thin_White_Duke 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/southpark/images/8/85/TheNewerFlagSP.png/revision/latest?cb=20160711173603