[–] greenfascist ago (edited ago)
hopefully afterwards, the blacks will have left willingly for africa, mexicans for mexico, and freedom loving americans of european descent will be saving europe from itself once again by expelling the moors.
and then on condition of liberating europe, force them to adopt the first and second amendment permanently without infringement.
[–] RubberHammer ago (edited ago)
Which is exactly what the -government- globalist wants. They make money selling arms. They make money lending for rebuilding.
[–] curiouserdude 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The globalists make money making money. Whatever causes the countries to go more into debt is what they're after. War tends to do that.
[–] RubberHammer ago
Exactly my point. This is a win-win situation for them. No civil war and they make money. Civil war and they make extra money.
[–] Cheesebooger 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
It isn't what they want. They lose all power.
[–] RubberHammer 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Who told you that? It opens the doors for massive loss of liberty. I did slightly speak incorrectly above. Fixed it.
When you have chaos and basically a civil war the people who are pulling the strings simply become more powerful unless dramatic and sweeping changes are also made. Which requires total victory. Which requires hanging most of our government, destruction of the federal reserve (which still requires lending from globalists to recover), and many institutional changes in agencies like the FBI, NSA, CIA, and many other three letter agencies.
It is many things but it most certainly is not the cut and dry, "they lose all power", bullshit you're spewing. This exact formula is how they've destroyed countless countries around the world. The singular rule is that their power has been greatly expanded. Sorry, but every bit of available information says you're completely wrong. It's certainly not clear The People have the fortitude to do what's required should it come to a civil war.
[–] ready-ignite 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Let's be clear about the reason for this here. We have a very public demonstration taking place that transfer of power does not currently occur by civil means in the US. The public can see this and is aware like never before. The sleeping masses are eyes open watching and communicating that this is taking place. Currently the sleeping masses participate in transfer of power by civil means -- voting. A further demonstration will signal to the public that they, too, must engage in politics by uncivil means to have a meaningful seat at the table. There are far more citizens in the country than the small network in power. That's a really shitty direction to take the brinksmanship.
[–] Tallest_Skil ago
No matter how many times people say this, it’s not true. 90% of people still don’t give a flying fuck about any of this. They’ve been conditioned, over the course of a century, to believe that voting does nothing. Jews purposely did this so that they could openly steal elections and get away with it. The sheep are not affected by this.
1/16th of the population works directly for the government. Their families are dependent on their incomes. That “small” network is a massive power block.