0
64

[–] o0shad0o 0 points 64 points (+64|-0) ago 

Most of these stores will wind up having to shut down rather than be under constant risk of robbery. Then people will be complaining about lack of service and lack of jobs.

0
39

[–] River_Otter 0 points 39 points (+39|-0) ago 

Bad neighborhoods already have few businesses to serve them for this reason. Even grocery store chains avoid them.

0
22

[–] 11223772? 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago 

Can you blame them? CVS took a gamble in Baltimore and the nigglets burnt it down and stole the drugs.

0
6

[–] vastrightwing 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I remember reading some time ago that big chain stores ruined cities. Later, all the chain stores disappeared. Guess what? Then everyone who cried foul about chain stores all of a sudden were in shock that small mom and pop stores were more expensive! huh! Go figure.

0
0

[–] Macdaddy5000 ago 

Yeah, we've got a couple of practically abandoned shopping centers with 40 - 50 buildings and all that's open is a chinese take-out, some sort of government office and a bodega in each one.

0
0

[–] 11230073? ago 

Not just robbery. It is unreal the amount of shoplifting that goes on. A town in Illinois of about 80,000 that has very ghetto parts but also very nice parts had a Jewel Osco that had to shut down because they were losing an average of $800/day from shoplifting. That's $5,600 a week! Congratulations, you now don't have a grocery store and your local community has fewer low skilled jobs.

1
12

[–] OhRutherfordBehave 1 point 12 points (+13|-1) ago 

Well, that's a black neighborhood for you.

0
4

[–] MadBro 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

That's the point. They are weaponizing poverty. More poor people = more ammo.

2
3

[–] Bigz_Sarducci 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Move out of Philly....

3
4

[–] antiliberalsociety 3 points 4 points (+7|-3) ago 

Fuck that defeatist attitude. Yeah run away like they won't follow. How about instead of letting them win you take a stand and reclaim your shit?

1
3

[–] Bigz_Sarducci 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

How about just move out of that shit neighborhood. If your customers ask why you are shutting down they can tell them some SJW-Politically Correct asshole wants dead store workers. But you are correct reclaim your life move out of the neighborhoods needing bulletproof glass to protect their store employees.

1
5

[–] Slagiatt 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Yeah, dont move to a white area, just kick the roughly 700,000 niggers out of philadelphia. Thats totally doable.

0
5

[–] wahala 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Yeah, don't run. Arm yourselves, store owners. You have the right to defend yourself.

0
1

[–] tendiesonfloor 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Sorry, but some of these nigtowns are going to have to be firebombed to the ground. Philly is definitely one of them.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 25 points (+25|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

1
12

[–] bourbonexpert 1 point 12 points (+13|-1) ago 

yah, everytime im in an area that has bullet proof glass verywhere just so i can buy a 6 pack. i know im enjoying diversity!

0
27

[–] antiliberalsociety 0 points 27 points (+27|-0) ago 

Feelings > public safety

[–] [deleted] 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] Tsilent_Tsunami ago 

She wants to put some controls on these small stores that she says sell booze, very little food and are the source of trouble in her district.

To be fair, it seems to be targeting ghetto liquor stores, which can be fairly problematic. Although, forcing them to expose themselves to the drunken niggers seems like an underhanded approach.

0
20

[–] crashing_this_thread 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

No one is going to want to work in these areas then. Ironically, the people living in these areas would want this, until they realize no businesses will risk being in their shit neighborhood. Is it indignant to have extra police presence in gang areas too? Is it indignant to warn citizens of dangerous areas? Is it indignant to avoid danger? I'd say they where naive, but they are just cruel inhuman scum pretending to be virtuous. They want death and suffering, nothing more.

This reminds me of how they had to change the name of gypsies. Since gypsies had too many bad connotations(because of gypsies being gypsies) they changed the name to Roma people. Guess what? Roma people are going to have the same bad connotations attached to their name as gypsy had.

0
12

[–] 11223267? 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Bass is to be commended for fighting establishments that attract crime and other problems in city.

Bit of horseshit here. Little corner stores don't generate crime, it's just they're either an easy target or the only target.

But the portion of her bill that would eliminate bulletproof glass — a sensible protection for employees — has no clear connection to her broader proposal. And Bass’ complaint that customers suffer “indignity” because of the bulletproof glass is nothing short of ridiculous. By the same token, don’t security cameras and security guards also push “indignity”? Aren’t they signals to customers that they aren’t necessarily trusted to abide by the law? Of course, she doesn’t have to pay for more security guards and cameras.

Absolute fact. Businesses have a duty to protect their interests, and that includes the well-being of the staff. It's more than a duty when it's a little family business and it's your kin in the line of fire.

0
5

[–] 0110001111 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Most stores will have some kind of insurance for stafff and liability. Most insurance companies will not insure these stores due to high risk, no security, and no collateral. So even if the store owner wants to stay open, they wont be able to, since one robbery or crime spree is enough to end them.

0
1

[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

of course with it the peacfull BLM enlighten half gods cant protest.

0
1

[–] lyin4rmu 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

doubt the bill would pass but mega LULs if it does.

load more comments ▼ (45 remaining)