0
0

[–] Kangaroopaw ago 

I believe the goats in particular appreciated the new environmemt

0
0

[–] Kofiannan ago 

It'S almost as if this post is advocating Muslim genocide? Surely not?

0
0

[–] Asvnoyi ago 

Ghengis Khan was a badass! If you want to read about a man that will make you say, "Hell Yeah! Git sum!" a lot read some books about him and his army. His people loved him. He forbid the selling of women, theft and fighting among his people. He forbid hunting game during the breeding season making him the first natural resources conservationist. But you better not piss him off, especially if you weren't Mongol. He created the largest contiguous land empire in the history of the world. The Muslims pissed him off when he sent an emissary under a flag of peace to ask permission to cross their land. The heathen Muslims killed his emissary. That pissed him off. Mistake! He wiped their ass out and added their lands to his empire. He took a lot of Muslim and Jewish slaves and wouldn't let them eat Halal food or get circumcised. He made it a death penalty to kill a sheep. It only applied to the Jews and Muslims.

The Mongol Empire existed during the 13th and 14th centuries and was the largest contiguous land empire in history. Originating in the steppes of Central Asia, the Mongol Empire eventually stretched from Eastern Europe to the Sea of Japan, extending northwards into Siberia, eastwards and southwards into the Indian subcontinent, Indochina, and the Iranian plateau, and westwards as far as the Levant. 24,000,000 km2 (9,300,000 sq mi)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_Empire

The Kingdom of Poland is a product of Ghengis Khan. It's good to see they are still sticking to their guns on Muslims.

0
0

[–] ZX4jBXu ago 

The Mongols were the most religiously tolerant expansionist empire in all of known history. Geghis Kahn himself put into law the first known laws of religious freedom back in the 1200's. Then a huge amount of them converted to Islam anyway so lol moot point methinks.

0
2

[–] 11059536? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Considering the human output of co2, killing mussies is also good in our fight against anthropomorphic climate change. Therefore killing mussies is a liberal cause everyone can get behind.

[–] [deleted] 1 point 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
3

[–] Palaver 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

If it weren't for the death of the Khan they would have likely reached the Atlantic

0
1

[–] wufong 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Maybe, maybe not. The Poles had them fucked twice only to spare them through acts of greed and over confidence. One time the Poles formed a defensive config that not only they couldn't break. It was costing them the lives of too many men trying to. And just as the Mongolian Generals were about to retreat, some over excited Poles broke rank and gave the Mongols the chance they needed. (Think The battle of Hastings.)

Another time the poles launched a suprise attack on the main Mongolian camp, killing thousands and causing the rest to flee. Pity that only half of the Poles decided to pursue the fleeing Mongols. The other half stayed in the camp getting drunk and looting. Giving the mongols a chance to regroup and defeat them.

The Poles were a real thorn in the mongols side. How they would have faired further into Europe is anyone's guess.

2
-2

[–] MannKepetry 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

tschernobyl is now a place where wildlife thrives. so bomb all nuclear plants i guess?

1
0

[–] BlockMe 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

You know who really sets muzzies off? Hulagu Khan. That guy pissed them off so much that bin Laden himself compared Bush to Hulagu.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2005/04/25/invaders-3

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)