6
-5

0
1

[–] 22jam22 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I find this argument highly plausible.. Good work voat detetcive.

0
1

[–] wgtt911 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Liberal leftist rage...

1
1

[–] Chiefpacman 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Woah, nice reporting.

We still don’t know who was killed yet? Did he get at her family? Just curious.

Guy is still scum, just want an end to the story.

0
2

[–] Trowa_Barton 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I would say most of the mass shootings we have seen in the last 10 years have been the result of an unhealthy society in one way or another. Thats not to take the blame away from the perpetrators, its just looking at the big picture.

3
2

[–] greycloud 3 points 2 points (+5|-3) ago 

he should have just killed the woman and child, no need to get other people involved.

1
4

[–] birds_sing 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

He wanted to cause as much pain to Tessa as she caused him, that's why he shot up the church his former in-laws was known to congregate.

Yeah, that's a very important part of the story that I had not heard before. Thank you.

0
9

[–] BobBelcher 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Thanks for your expert analysis there Dr Shadow332, but you're wrong.

At the time of his court martial he was married to Tessa Loge.

The church he shot up was attended by the family of (and he killed the grandmother of) his second wife, Danielle Shields.

To be perfectly clear, Tessa Loge is NOT Danielle Shields. Danielle Shields is NOT Tessa Loge.

And it was known during the court martial that the child involved was his stepson. No cuckery involved if he went into the relationship with the kid already being there (hence a stepchild) and especially not if he didn't believe the child was his. Because that's what cuckery is. A man's wife cheats and has a child with the other man and fools the husband into believing it's his.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5056797/Texas-church-shooter-s-teenage-best-friend-tells-all.html

What this is a case of is a very mentally disturbed person with a history of being violent, being violent to the extreme.

1
-1

[–] shadow332 [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

It's not an "expert analysis". Just throwing ideas out there for discussion.

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)