[–] MrWicked 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
The website it links to is the same website that was proven a scam. It's behind a paywall and if you pay it will just bring up an arrest record IF he has one. If Tony has been indicted then the indictment is still sealed. If he was arrested it would be unsealed. If he made a deal the indictment and arrest record would still be unsealed upon his arrest.
[–] Millennial_Falcon [M] ago (edited ago)
This blog cites disinfo site "yournewswire" as source. Flairing as possible disinfo.
[–] 11001795? [S] 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago (edited ago)
Tony Podesta Arrested: Indictments Issued Against Hillary Clinton & John Podesta
November 5, 2017 Sean Adl-Tabatabai News, US 2
Democrat lobbyist Tony Podesta was arrested Saturday night and taken into custody by the U.S. Marshals office as new indictments were also issued against Hillary Clinton and John Podesta.
Tony Podesta is the founder of the Podesta Group and brother of John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s former campaign chair. He was forced to resign earlier this week amid an ongoing criminal investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller, as rumors swirled that a sealed indictment may have been issued against him.
According to sources within the U.S. Marshals Office, Tony voluntarily handed himself in late on Saturday night on the basis that there would be no media coverage of his arrest. Tony Podesta Arrested: Indictments Issued Against Hillary Clinton & John Podesta
November 5, 2017 Sean Adl-Tabatabai News, US 2
Democrat lobbyist Tony Podesta was arrested Saturday night and taken into custody by the U.S. Marshals office as new indictments were also issued against Hillary Clinton and John Podesta.
Tony Podesta is the founder of the Podesta Group and brother of John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s former campaign chair. He was forced to resign earlier this week amid an ongoing criminal investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller, as rumors swirled that a sealed indictment may have been issued against him.
According to sources within the U.S. Marshals Office, Tony voluntarily handed himself in late on Saturday night on the basis that there would be no media coverage of his arrest.
Lawyers for Hillary Clinton and John Podesta are pleading with Mueller to keep their indictments sealed and have similarly agreed to hand themselves in next week under the same agreement.
Despite the media blackout, a public record confirms Tony Podesta’s arrest in Washington D.C and can be [url=https://www.searchquarry.com/namesearch/register?fname=Anthony&lname=Podesta&city=Washington&state=DC&courthouse=District of Columbia District Court - Washington]viewed online here[/url].
To access the arrest record requires a paid subscription, but those details have been obtained and are as follows:
Anthony T Podesta 74 Washington, DC Falls Church, VA Lehigh Acres, FL New York, NY (202) 393-**** (202) 363-**** (202) 667-**** (202) 450-**** (202) 671-**** a@gmail.com p@podesta.com a*********@yahoo.com a@aol.com a@winning.com
The podesta@podesta.com email address matches the ones used by Tony in the Wikileaks release.
Note that Tony Podesta has provided authorities with an email address for the domain name winning.com – a site that belongs to Hollywood actor Charlie Sheen.
Why on earth would a Democrat lobbying connected to the Clinton’s have an admin email address for Charlie Sheen’s website?
[–] kestrel9 ago
That site doesn't prove he was arrested either. All we know for sure is that James Brower tweeted that one of the sealed indictments was for Tony Podesta.
So 'sources', and 'no media' (we can't verify either). The records posted don't indicate a date, some claim it was old traffic tickets? I'm no fan clearly, and it's not that I don't think it possible he turned himself in, or is cutting a deal whatever. I just haven't seen disclosure of an actual arrest.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mueller-probe-draws-in-tony-podesta-vin-weber-ap/
If the investigation has moved into the U1 area, and the Podestas have damning, prosecutable evidence against them, demonstrating their participation in and profiting from actions that endangered national security and potentially even involved state secrets, who knows how that is handled. A private court?