1
3

[–] theoldones 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

we now there propoganda fails hard already, so the kids wont be as willing as they think

0
13

[–] Pulverizor 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

Resurrect Walt! He wouldn't stand for this jewry.

1
4

[–] Turnip_Time 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Having read his biography I'm fairly certain he didn't hate kikes. The whole Disney antisemitism meme stems from Walt joining an anti commie organization (he was worried about his cartoonists unionizing) that was far more right wing than it outwardly appeared.

0
3

[–] Vortonet 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

0
15

[–] SurfinMindWaves 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

Disney has been targeting our kids since day one. As a child, how did you feel when you watched Bambi's mother get shot? What percentage of their stories are about a single-parent home? What has the cinderella/princess meme done for our daughters? My son was never exposed to anything Disney, but I've met a few young people whose parents let them watch nothing but Disney growing up, somehow thinking this crap was some kind of wholesome entertainment.

0
7

[–] Mr_Wolf 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Not to mention all the furies that will admit Disney put them on that path.

0
0

[–] addie89 ago 

You mean furries right? Those crazy animal sex costume freaks?

1
8

[–] basedputin 1 point 8 points (+9|-1) ago 

actually disney was founded by a gentile. (and was pretty antisemitic)

once it was taken by (((them))) they have pushed degeneracy onto our kids. jpg

11
-10

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] SurfinMindWaves ago 

Nobody is stopping you from enjoying their many lovely family-friendly stories, go for it.

0
2

[–] basedputin 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

oy vey who could have predicted this jpg

0
2

[–] KILLtheRATS 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Any kid with parents stupid enough to let them watch this shit is already fucker

0
1

[–] OnlyAPseudonym 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

what is the purpose of this gay propaganda then?

0
2

[–] Master_Foo 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

what is the purpose of this gay propaganda then?

It's to piss off people without any real problems. I'm really jealous of the people who have time to complain about stupid shit. Here I am, with the weight and responsible of my entire household and family on my hands. Working, paying bills, making sure my mom has a reliable car to drive around in, making investments, feeding everyone, etc. And these people have the luxury about caring about a stupid TV show they don't even want to watch.

I'd absolutely love to have your problems people.

0
0

[–] thrushlimberger ago 

The last time I watched TV was while my mother was dying of a work related lung condition. She said one of the nice things about being dead would be never having to watch TV again.

0
0

[–] SonOfSnowden ago 

Sexuality has a very large nurture component. Put men in prison and eventually they'll not only fuck each-other but most will actually start preferring it to straight sex.

In the old days, when the gay lobby was fighting anti-gay laws, they claimed that sexuality was something you're born with. Now they're claiming that you can be "gender fluid", "non binary" etc. (which are elaborate ways of claiming various degrees of bisexuality) The only thing that's absolutely clear is that they are totally full of shit.

Gay propaganda and normalization does indeed correlate positively to higher rates of homosexuality. This should be obvious by the overwhelming increase in faggotry among millennials.

0
0

[–] OnlyAPseudonym ago 

Even if that is true (not saying it isn't), what does anyone get out of there being more homosexual people?

0
1

[–] BlackSheepBrouhaha 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

So what's the Voat consensus on the cause of male homosexuality? Is it genetic, prenatal hormones, neurological abnormalities similar to fetishes, early childhood sexual contact or abuse, or are gay men attracted to women but sleep with men because they're moral degenerates brainwashed by zionist media?

The cause of it is important. I don't think the Greeks were brainwashed by jews, and they exhibited a lot of homosexual behavior. Even pederasty, which is disgusting.

What do you think?

0
2

[–] AceToMouth 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I think the latest research from one of the Scandinavian countries pointed to a 33% genetic component and the rest was due to specific environmental factors.

So you can be genetically susceptible to being gay but without specific environmental factors you will still be straight.

0
1

[–] SonOfSnowden 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

These are the same countries that refuse to admit that biological sex creates differences in men and women... I'd take their "studies" with the same weight as any other propaganda.

0
4

[–] shrink 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Biologyfag here (not attempting to make any argument from authority, simply stating I have some background experience in biological fields)

Given everything I've seen and read about the subject over the years, it can be either or both. Genetically, a male can be born with the genetic abnormality that makes them attracted to males, a quality that should only be present in female brains. Being born with this defect, they can't change it. However, there is also a very high percentage of people in the "gay community" who were abused as a child, almost always sexually, and usually from an older family member of the same sex. These instances occur far too frequently in the personal pasts of gay people to simply discount as correlation without causation; sexual impropriety towards children has terrible, drastic effects on their emotional and sexual development. I have also seen, firsthand, some select individuals who make the active decision that 'they're gay now' or otherwise make it clear that it's a choice they made, even if they claim otherwise.

So in conclusion, I've seen a great deal of evidence that both nature and nurture are responsible for someone being gay; overwhelmingly, it is one or the other that is responsible for one's gay sexuality, rarely both together. On the note of the "nurture" homosexuality subject, homosexuals, as their homosexuality is derived from a literal genetic or emotional aberration, in many instances continue a cycle of abuse. Many homosexuals who were abused as children grow up to have a sexual fascination with doing the same things to children that were done to them; look around enough and you'll see a number of examples in which two gay men try whatever means necessary to gain custody of a little boy or two, rarely will it be a young girl.

0
1

[–] BlackSheepBrouhaha 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Thanks for sharing that.

If we prevent child child abuse, so many problems will fade into obscurity.

0
0

[–] SonOfSnowden ago 

Aaaand the disproportionately high rate of homosexuality that arises from single mother homes. Good luck getting your hands on that data though... it's possibly the most fiercely covered up stat in all of psychology.

0
1

[–] Master_Foo 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The cause of it is important.

In my mind it's not. But I'm a classical liberal. So, in my way of thinking, it doesn't matter the reasons someone does something. What matters is liberty. There are a lot of things I do that would probably piss off a homogay. But, I don't even have to spend one minute justifying my reasons for it for one second to him because, regardless of whether it's a compulsion or a choice, it's my liberty to do so.

And to be consistant and to have integrity with myself, I have to allow the same liberty to the homofag. He doesn't need to justify why he's a homofag, because, it doesn't fucking matter.

0
0

[–] BlackSheepBrouhaha ago 

The question is about propaganda. It's important if one can be persuaded into being gay, and you are opposed to it. You're for classical liberty, but I don't know any parents that treat their kids like libertarians. It's a monarchy, aristocracy at best. People censor their children to limit exposure to corrupting ideas. The question broadly asked, does mere exposure to homosexual characters on television make a person more likely to be homosexual? Or is it just more likely to realize they're homosexual? Or is it something else entirely and the media merely reflects the people in the culture we live in?

0
0

[–] addie89 ago 

This is the whole nature vs nurture argument. I don't think it is ever one or the other. It has to be both.

0
0

[–] BlackSheepBrouhaha ago 

Right, Life is genes expressed in an environment. All organisms neglected by their environment die.

load more comments ▼ (12 remaining)