[–] MasivGam3 ago (edited ago)
Just because you keep saying that doesn't make it true.
That is irrelevant. The burden of proof is on you. Please prove that there is a direct cause-and-effect link as you claimed. The fact is - you can't.
their international poisoners are exterminated
You are getting annoying. You reminded me of those stereotypical Jews Hitler portrayed in Mein Kampf where they, when defeated by a sound argument, will turn around the other day and begin repeating their already debunked lies as if nothing ever happened. I already told you that you are operating with an incorrect English translation. The German original does not speak about an "extermination", it says "uprooted" when speaking about political adversaries, which carries a very different meaning. Don't you get that? Why the fuck are you repeating it?
Well it is
Oh, my! Look! We have the recipe for world domination right here! Let's just write a boring, chaotic and amateurish book about our "political ideologies and philosophies as well as our future plans" and the world is ours! ... What a fucking nonsense!
This appears to be the crux of your argument
It is. Because you are mixing up two very different things and are constantly trying to bend facts into conforming with your ideological claims.
but you are also trying to defend the book as being very tamed and ordinary
Because that's what it was.
when it's the exact opposite of that
It isn't. Quote from Wiki for you: "...Benito Mussolini was also critical of the book, saying that it was "a boring tome that I have never been able to read" and remarked that Hitler's beliefs, as expressed in the book, were "little more than commonplace clichés"." Exactly. The book for the most part is boring and it does not contain anything that at that time in Europe wasn't not only a commonplace among laymen, but was published in hundreds of other books and hundreds of newspapers every fucking day. Every other person in Europe at that time thought the same.
[–] the_sovereign ago
I don't think Benito Mussolini's endorsement of "boring tome" is a glowing endorsement for your argument. I don't know what else to tell you. You say I mistranslated it, but then you also say I didn't and that I took it out of context for WW1. Clearly the author of the book and the majority of people who read it were inspired enough to become Nazis and execute the Holocaust - a pretty clear cause and effect. If you're trying to argue that people are ultimately responsible for their actions, I won't disagree with you, but to deny the influence the book had on the rise of Nazi German is pure lunacy. I'm afraid the burden of proof is on you my friend for every major historian and most people would highly disagree with you.
[–] MasivGam3 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
That is only your opinion and you have any right to have it.
Because those who do not agree with the only "correct" version of history are haunted and their carrier and lives ruined. That's why there is such beautiful consensus about things often obviously wrong.
No doubt about that. As they will be told by CNN all they need to know.
And - burden of proof is with you regardless, as it was you who put forward the claim. You have a claim - you provide the proof. The speculation that "everybody knows it" and "don't you agree with the authorities?" are typical examples of logical fallacy - as you have no proof, you are indulging in demagogy. Not that it was hard to foresee.