[–] DeltaBravoTango 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
It would be about as useless as the "No Animals Were Harmed" statement.
[–] greycloud 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
i wouldn't watch movies that had that disclaimer. i demand that more movies require sexual assault of actors/actresses who are starring in the film. it proves dedication on the actor/actresses' part and alleviates my butthurt for not being as rich as they are.
[–] CANCEL-CAT-FACTS [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
You should be a movie producer and a film critic at the same time.
[–] Wonder_Boy 0 points 14 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago
You mean like this? https://kek.gg/i/5gywsc.jpg
[–] Eualos 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
No film could pass that test though. The money that financed it would always be dirty.