[–]10657674?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
Not "German too", primarily German
Just because there may be more German Schwarzmanns than Jewish Schwarzmanns in Germany (or even eorldwide) does not mean that there are not also enough Jewish Schwarzmanns worldwide for my assumption to be justifiable, especially when my assumption had the added context of race-mixing art on the cover of a book.
Trying to justify the fact that you literally judged a book by its cover. Retarded.
That expression is about judging the contents (specifically quality) of a book based on its cover. Despite the expression, all readers judge books by their covers. I'm an author; I'm well aware of this reality. If the subject of the book is not in some way non-Finns breeding with Finns (be it serious or satire) the cover would not be as it is -- thus my basis for assuming content is solid and you are grasping at straws trying to delegitimize the very justifiable association I made.
You clearly lied by claiming that you said earlier it was both a German and a Jewish name
I've already established that it is. Enough Jews and Germans worldwide hold the name that I am willing to say it is also a Jewish name (and outside of Germany I warrant it is more common among Jews, since more Jews fled Germany than Germany in recent generations).
all you said was that it was a Jewish name. You're trying to retroactively change your argument.
At no point did I state that Jews and only Jews hold the name Schwarzmann. I've known the word has its roots in the German langusge from the beginning; it's plainly obvious. I simply knew that enough Jews hold the name worldwide for my associations to be justified. You're just reacting in a fluster because you think I'm dragging German name history through the mud or some such nonsense -- sorry to say but if anyone is responsible for the slow death of German culture and history the Germans who keep voting in an anti-German politician are.
[–] 10657674? ago
Just because there may be more German Schwarzmanns than Jewish Schwarzmanns in Germany (or even eorldwide) does not mean that there are not also enough Jewish Schwarzmanns worldwide for my assumption to be justifiable, especially when my assumption had the added context of race-mixing art on the cover of a book.
That expression is about judging the contents (specifically quality) of a book based on its cover. Despite the expression, all readers judge books by their covers. I'm an author; I'm well aware of this reality. If the subject of the book is not in some way non-Finns breeding with Finns (be it serious or satire) the cover would not be as it is -- thus my basis for assuming content is solid and you are grasping at straws trying to delegitimize the very justifiable association I made.
I've already established that it is. Enough Jews and Germans worldwide hold the name that I am willing to say it is also a Jewish name (and outside of Germany I warrant it is more common among Jews, since more Jews fled Germany than Germany in recent generations).
At no point did I state that Jews and only Jews hold the name Schwarzmann. I've known the word has its roots in the German langusge from the beginning; it's plainly obvious. I simply knew that enough Jews hold the name worldwide for my associations to be justified. You're just reacting in a fluster because you think I'm dragging German name history through the mud or some such nonsense -- sorry to say but if anyone is responsible for the slow death of German culture and history the Germans who keep voting in an anti-German politician are.
[–] [deleted] ago