[–] clamhurt_legbeard 0 points 23 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago
If I'm drunk I can't consent to driving so I can't be charged with drunk driving.
[–] Bigwhistle 0 points 20 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago
How many college kids have had their lives ruined by lying, jilted coeds, and insane college administrators. This shit is off the rails.
[–] 0110001111 0 points 17 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago
College logic: Trump is a fascist Nazi. Now excuse us whilst we use secret Title IX courts to ream students with no due process, neuter the state in not prosecuting campus crimes, raising tuition every year, and ban any dissenting groups in the campus. We also reserve the right to fine/kick you out of campus for no reason, without notice, with no refunds.
[–] Popsquat81 0 points 12 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago
So, by that same logic, does drinking any alcohol negate any intent by the alleged perpetrator as well?
[–] ScreaminMime 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
...it ran “a fair and impartial judicial process”
Only the male was to blame. He had also been drinking, why wasn't the female kicked out too?
[–] Tsilent_Tsunami 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Why wasn't the female charged with rape? Guy literally couldn't consent.
[–] WD_Pelley 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago (edited ago)
Retroactively negating sexual consent if an accusing student has even a sip of alcohol
So a girl could have one teensy tiny sip of an appletini and still fuck up a guy's life because she regretted sleeping with him?
Roe’s first written statement emphasized that Nokes had coerced her into performing oral sex and digitally penetrated her without consent, while both were “under the influence.”
What the hell is "digitally penetrated?"
[–] L_Etranger 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
Fingers are digits. He poked her box.
[–] FreeBreivik 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
He fingered her "I pee" but didn't manage to slip a Trojan in the backdoor.
He penetrated her vagina with one of his digits. That is, he fingered her.
[–] newoldwave 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Since when the hell have universities become law enforcement agencies?
[–] voatHatesTheFirst 0 points 57 points 57 points (+57|-0) ago (edited ago)
How did this 'drunk consent isn't consent' bullshit ever even get started?
There is a mountain of precedence in the form of consent to breath test for DUI stops.
Nevermind the fact that if you were supposedly too out of your mind drunk to consent, then your testimony is obviously worthless in the first place. ie.. How are we to accept your version of events, when by your own admission you were drunk out of your mind. ie.. If you didn't know what you were doing, you obviously don't know what happened.
[–] White-Supremacist 2 points 21 points 23 points (+23|-2) ago
Jews. Cultural marxism.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 19 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago
[–] Subtenko ago
There's all kinds of holes in this BS, so how do these cases keep popping up, unless the people who are legit victimized cant think of this stuff or the 'legal system' is doing double speak anyway regardless of this whole precedent...
This makes being a lawyer seems possibly...fun........ehh who am I kidding, its probably the exact opposite minus the payout
[–] [deleted] 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago (edited ago)
[–] Tsilent_Tsunami 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
But wait a minute. So the outraged parent of the victim should be able to beat the living shit out of the principal, and the principal will also go to jail. Is that not the logic?
[–] cthulian_axioms 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
I'm so glad that I am banned from Canada for life. (Technically I can apply for "criminal rehabilitation" and become admissible again, but that costs $2000 and I'm not giving those bobble-headed cucks a Goddamn dime.)
[–] lanre 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
You know what? I was always told that being drunk didn't excuse any of my actions. If I went and shot a dude while drunk, broke some shit, or mouthed off, the consequences were still gonna be there the next day. Taking advantage of drunk chicks is slimy, but so is slamming horny college kids for getting drunk together and fucking.
[–] cthulian_axioms 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago (edited ago)
And in a sane society, it's the kind of thing that gets a person beaten up and/or left in a ditch, according to the degree of creepitude. Not everything needs to be solved in the courts.