[–] goatsshadow ago (edited ago)
so basically as a man get drunk and rape women.... that's the logical contra-positive... no wonder it isn't allowed. what a bunch of retards this is barely debatable between toddlers (educated/white toddlers)
Edit: Black toddlers would be coached by a bt1000 mongaloid
[–] newoldwave 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Since when the hell have universities become law enforcement agencies?
[–] WD_Pelley 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago (edited ago)
Retroactively negating sexual consent if an accusing student has even a sip of alcohol
So a girl could have one teensy tiny sip of an appletini and still fuck up a guy's life because she regretted sleeping with him?
Roe’s first written statement emphasized that Nokes had coerced her into performing oral sex and digitally penetrated her without consent, while both were “under the influence.”
What the hell is "digitally penetrated?"
He penetrated her vagina with one of his digits. That is, he fingered her.
[–] FreeBreivik 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
He fingered her "I pee" but didn't manage to slip a Trojan in the backdoor.
[–] L_Etranger 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
Fingers are digits. He poked her box.
[–] Popsquat81 0 points 12 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago
So, by that same logic, does drinking any alcohol negate any intent by the alleged perpetrator as well?
[–] goatsandbros 3 points 2 points 5 points (+5|-3) ago
You know, as much as I hate the idea of some thot fucking up a young guy's life, it's teaching us that traditionalism has a real place in sexuality.
[–] ScreaminMime 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
Only the male was to blame. He had also been drinking, why wasn't the female kicked out too?
[–] Tsilent_Tsunami 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Why wasn't the female charged with rape? Guy literally couldn't consent.