1
2

[–] TheTrigger 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

About fucking time.

0
0

[–] HarveyHarveyJones ago 

For real? I think this is the most retarded thing i've read all morning.

0
0

[–] Ajaxofbarbaria ago 

Just wait. You'll write something worse soon.

0
3

[–] ZX4jBXu 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

You all laugh but CUI ain't nothing to joke about.

0
5

[–] White-Supremacist 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

"We clocked you going 11 in a 7mph river school zone. Gonna need you to step out of the canoe."

0
3

[–] 10646443? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I'm taking my canoe and a two litre full of rum and coke out on the road right now.

1
1

[–] The_Red_Kraken 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

As long as it's not done in a heavily transited lane or a dangerous (rapids, too vast and deep, etc) place, then I'm ok with that.

0
12

[–] Sosacms 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Only in a situation where they could hurt others. There's no need for "save them from themselves" laws.

0
2

[–] belrial 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

A million times this.

0
3

[–] DependasaurusRex 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Silly Canadia...

0
2

[–] Runaway-White-Slave 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Not like that will solve their Kike problem or anything, but yeah canoeing is not the same without extracurricular activities, alcohol counts.

0
0

[–] DinoRider ago 

As it says, we still have laws against drinking in public and reckless endangerment. We never needed this law in the first place.

The ridiculous part of this law is that you can have your driver’s license suspended and your car impounded for something unrelated to driving.

What if you don’t have a car or a license? Does that mean this law doesn’t apply to you?

A friend told me the same ridiculous penalties apply to fishing without a license or in restricted areas. You can have your driver’s license suspended.

Why did lawmakers start assuming everyone has a driver’s license and use it as a standard penalty instead of fining?

0
0

[–] GlobalSouth ago 

I'm guessing that this law was seen as discriminatory toward the indigenous peoples.

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)