[–] GlobalSouth ago
I'm guessing that this law was seen as discriminatory toward the indigenous peoples.
[–] whatisbestinlife 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
does that include passing lanes?
[–] TheTrigger ago
If you get pulled over and can recite the alphabet backwards without confusing "zed" for "zee", then you're good.
[–] The_Red_Kraken 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
As long as it's not done in a heavily transited lane or a dangerous (rapids, too vast and deep, etc) place, then I'm ok with that.
[–] TheTrigger 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
About fucking time.
[–] HarveyHarveyJones ago
For real? I think this is the most retarded thing i've read all morning.
[–] Runaway-White-Slave 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Not like that will solve their Kike problem or anything, but yeah canoeing is not the same without extracurricular activities, alcohol counts.
[–] DinoRider ago
As it says, we still have laws against drinking in public and reckless endangerment. We never needed this law in the first place.
The ridiculous part of this law is that you can have your driver’s license suspended and your car impounded for something unrelated to driving.
What if you don’t have a car or a license? Does that mean this law doesn’t apply to you?
A friend told me the same ridiculous penalties apply to fishing without a license or in restricted areas. You can have your driver’s license suspended.
Why did lawmakers start assuming everyone has a driver’s license and use it as a standard penalty instead of fining?