0
1

[–] belphegorsprime 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I remember something wack and sjwish about Pale Moon coming up recently, but then even more recently, I saw it at the top of a recommended browsers list here on voat. Can you remind my why Pale Moon is wack again?

0
7

[–] TheTrigger 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

They've started arbitrarily blacklisting extensions (that they don't like) from working on their browser. Literally any other Firefox fork is better than it, at this point. But I, personally, recommend Waterfox. Whoever made that list of browsers is not informed of the current happenings in browserland.

They even rated Waterfox as being "insecure", when it's easily up there (on par) with Icecat, if not better because it's updated more frequently.

0
0

[–] MadWorld ago 

They've started arbitrarily blacklisting extensions (that they don't like) from working on their browser.

I thought it was done for security or stability reasons.

But I, personally, recommend Waterfox.

I run my own sync1/1.5 server and can synchronize for all my friends and my own devices without a problem. Does the Waterfox have a similar feature to synchronize between multiple browsers without storing the bookmarks on third party unencrypted?

0
0

[–] belphegorsprime ago 

They also kind of shat on command line browsers. I get that they are not for everyone, but they can be useful to some. They definitely don't deserve to be at the bottom of the list. I will have to take a look at waterfox and icecat. I've been playing with Brave, but I'm not happy with the tab styling. They waste too much screen real-estate. That is one thing that chromium got right.

0
1

[–] nothingproud 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You're damn right, have trialed Icecat, Pale Moon, Brave and Waterfox.

Waterfox is hands down the best all round browser I've used.