[–] [deleted] 0 points 12 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago
[–] kamtsa 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Confirmation bias is when you cherry pick data points that match that your hypothesis. For example, (((Soros))) is for open borders but (((Netanyahu))) rebuked him, or (((Stephen Miller ))) explains to CNN the benefit of tight immigration policy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-J4FvxtD9I
Confirmation bias is a very common practice on VOAT, people post selective negative anecdotes that about the races/religions/ethnicities they hate and ignore counter examples.
The rational way to deal with large diverse population is using statistics and distributions, not using selected anecdotes.
You can read further here https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/anecdotal
[–] Guy_Justsome 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Agreed.
But I wish the memesters would have a better handle on English. Confusing "party's" and "parties" is a fourth grader's mistake.
[–] CowWithBeef ago
How exactly do the jews survive white genocide? Do the jews feel they've already been genocided by white dna? Aren't we playing into their racial division plan by believing white genocide is happening? Are the Amish not proof that none of this plan will work? Genuinely asking, not interested in persuading anyone to a position I don't have. I'm only applying some skepticism to the Jewish sourced white genocide theory.
[–] 1Sorry_SOB ago
Do you want to be the Amish? A curiosity.
[–] CowWithBeef 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
There are pros and cons. I don't think I could adapt to the work ethic. It's very rare for an outsider to fully join though many spend time trying it out. I would have to be raised that way from early childhood to thrive. I'm better suited to versions of libertarian societies. Constitutional USA sounds pretty good to me.
I don't think this is relevant to my questions though.