0
0

[–] PeaceDogg ago 

At some point you just have to laugh. They are so ridiculous, so stupid!

0
1

[–] Narcissism 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

They do that in Asian countries if the baby is born wrong they get exited. Simply put they can't afford to keep a child thats disabled its too much burden.

0
2

[–] fartyshorts 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

0
1

[–] srayzie 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

That is one of the sickest things I've ever heard. Wtf?! The sick freaks use the term "after-birth abortion". I'm shocked that they posted something so sick.

1
-1

[–] gamepwn [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Same. I felt nothing but contempt and disgust reading this. Literally arguing on the right to murder newborn children. Revolting to the extreme and sickening to the core.

0
1

[–] srayzie 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It shows how much they value a life. Every person has the right to live. We as adults are supposed to protect the innocent. So when I hear of someone that abuses that, it's hard to even wrap my head around. They are the worst piece of scum in my eyes. Sadly, those are the kinds of people that rule our world.

0
0

[–] AngB23 ago  (edited ago)

Ironic....some of the "Directors" of the Mailbox at the 88-90 building connected to Ricky Dearman was a Professor at Oxford. Beverley Frances Gardiner. A professor of CHILD PSYCHOLOGY and she also goes to many other countries, usually poor, testing for parent intervention.

https://imgur.com/a/oGXzY

[–] [deleted] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] gamepwn [S] ago  (edited ago)

They are arguing about the right to kill children post birth. Saying their lives don't matter." "Parents should be allowed to have their newborn babies killed because they are “morally irrelevant” and ending their lives is no different to abortion, a group of medical ethicists linked to Oxford University has argued"

"Rather than being “actual persons”, newborns were “potential persons”. They explained: “Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’ in the sense of ‘subject of a moral right to life’"

"As such they argued it was “not possible to damage a newborn by preventing her from developing the potentiality to become a person in the morally relevant sense”.

This is an Elite institution pushing for the right to murder newborn baby children AFTER they are born. This has everything to do with Pizzagate.