0
7

[–] Astupidname69 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Like that time where they claimed the Syrian government had nuclear WMDs gassed it's own people. Which was then used as a justification to blow up a Syrian government held airbase?

1
0

[–] ShinyVoater 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

The first time around Obama got utterly humiliated by his promise to put boots on the ground if a chemical attack was faked. The missile salvo Trump threw not only short circuited any claims he was just standing by, but was also so ineffectual it didn't even set the Syrian government back in any meaningful capacity(the runways were repaired within a day or two).

[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] Tsilent_Tsunami ago 

What's the story there? Don't pay much attention to user names, but have recently seen that user saying odd stuff. Also seems logic-challenged, as in fallacy is their argument style.

0
0

[–] Astupidname69 ago 

And lets ignore the fact they these are the fuckers who claimed Assad gassed his people not too long before that either, which of, turned out to be total bullshit back then as well. In fact I seem to recall that there was considerable evidence that it was the rebels who were using chemical weapons at that time, then tried to pin it on Assad.

0
1

[–] 9-11 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

They kinda did though. Unless took control of assad's silos and gassed themselves - actually i think that is the counter narrative.

0
0

[–] chaos63 [S] ago 

I seem to recall anti-Assad troops boasting about having chemical weapons now, and even a clip on the news where they gassed mice and said they would gas Assad's forces. Let me see if I can find it or if it has become one of those news clips that get shown a few times then kinda disappear once the narrative changes

0
3

[–] Cheesebooger 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Jews are liars.

0
2

[–] caniscanem 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Bolshevik Bullshit Con

0
0

[–] 10265202? ago 

I don't remember this ever being the real impetus for invading Iraq. It was one of those convenient "see, they are kind of evil". Which the Iraqi government actually was regardless of that truth. The case made to the UN and the international community absolutely didn't hinge on this particular thing.

0
0

[–] ShinyVoater ago 

Variations of this line have been passed around since Britain told the world the Hun were stabbing Belgian babies on bayonets for fun back in World War I. For something so well-tread, you'd think people would've noticed it by now.

0
0

[–] BlackDadsScatter ago 

The biased broadcast company strikes again notice to all uk members DO NOT PAY YOUR TV LICENSE,it enables the cunts and the spare change pays the paedophile presenters hush money/compo/court fees

0
0

[–] Turnip_Time ago 

Joke's on them. I think more dead hajis is a good thing.

0
0

[–] ScreaminMime ago 

Pretty sure we invaded because we were sick of them pissing all over the Treaty that ended the Gulf War.

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)