0
2

[–] Eualos 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The top one has more of an impact long term, just look at ghangus khan

0
3

[–] Seventh_Jim 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Your question shows you have no understanding of the order of things; it is a category error.

Culture follows genetics. The man with many children is spreading both, as even the bastards will take after his intelligence, his emotional capacity, and his physical appearance. The two are not separable.

0
3

[–] clamhurt_legbeard [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

If a rich playboy bangs a bunch of skanks who all become single mothers, you think they will all become successful CEOs based on nothing but 50% of the father's genetics?

0
4

[–] Seventh_Jim 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

No. I would expect that, factoring in the genes of the mother, regression to the mean, and environmental factors (culture if you like), you're going to see a higher degree of leadership, aggressiveness, rational thinking, and Machiavellianism than the average person, with prevalence above one standard deviation of the mean.

Those traits are going to influence the culture that the person creates around them.

0
4

[–] Le_Squish 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Outbreeding your enemies is the most tried and true method.