[–] sidewaythighgap ago
Why not just buy another brand? Why is it so important to police all brands into making plus size? I don't buy Lululemon because their price doesn't fit my budget. Do I go on a crusade about how this is classist?
What about brands that don't make things small enough for me? Are these all feminist issues?
Finding things that fit well can be a challenge at all sizes. That's inevitable with ready to wear. Why create imaginary issues out of the thin air???
[–] ThrowAwaySwoleBro ago
This should be an archive post. We need to stop feeding the hams. Also a biking singlet?
[–] OnlyReadsFPH ago (edited ago)
A company's job is to serve the marketplace. If you do that enough with a quality product you will make money. It is not their responsibility to sacrifice profits for the minority. If they thought they could make more money, they would.
Another gross feminist blaming the world instead of just being an active participant in it.
[–] l23r 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Is there some dick pouch in those shorts, like in boxer briefs, that would make those bike shorts look weird on people without that anatomical feature? I don't understand why they just can't wear the "mens" clothing. If they're fat, it's not like the small mens would be too large for them anyways.
[–] ep9 [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
They would be snug, I'm not certain what the difference between male and female is. I think the chamois (pad inside) is shaped a little different... But really, I'd guess there are more MALE riders than female, they are probably just going for a bigger market, considering they have all sorts of women already cornered
[–] WHAT_WHAT ago
I can't figure out how women would work with those over shoulder straps. On a normal female maybe but esp massive BEWBS it's going to look like clown suspenders right?