[–] PhilaFerret 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
It's an AARP inspired effort and the article is written by and for attorneys.
“We’re talking about everything you may have a problem with – abuse, neglect, sexual assault, a wide variety of things – they are now saying you are waiving your right to full justice.”
Clintonian absolution of truth.
[–] p0ssum [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
It's an AARP inspired effort and the article is written by and for attorneys.
Ok, so you think it's OK to make abuse of a human go through arbitration rather than a criminal court. Are you fucking serious? I know you boys can spin just about anything, but I must say, this is impressive mental gymnastics.
[–] PhilaFerret ago
No. That's a false-acceptance argument projected against a pseudo-narrative. Existing legal options are always available, including government economic representatives.
Do not call me a boy; it's unnecessarily condescending and neglectfully inappropriate.
Is mental gymnastics your definition of an exercise in futility or the usual incomprehension of logical arguments and facts?
[–] derram ago
https://archive.is/ZEqQM | :
'The AHCA said Congress has repeatedly rejected legislation to invalidate arbitration agreements. '
'Under its proposed revisions, CMS said nursing homes would be required to write the arbitration agreements in plain language and explain the agreement to the prospective resident or his or her representative. '
'Carolina Fortin-Garcia, a CMS spokesperson, said the agency will respond to public comments received when it issues the final rule. '
'Public comments on the CMS proposal to do away with that rule are due Monday and groups are urging the agency to reconsider. '
'Remington Gregg, counsel for civil justice and consumer rights at Public Citizen, said the rule change is not only unnecessary, but shameful. '
This has been an automated message.