0
0

[–] 123_456 ago 

They're not people. Why the fuck do people keep bringing this up?

0
1

[–] acWeynotAn4 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

If corporations are people

Corporations are NOT people. Corporations are virtual machines existing in the legal meta-space.

They were essentially invented to separate business from individuals. That is their primary purpose. They are a thing of their own kind.

0
1

[–] PM_ME_YOUR_BOOBS2 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

because its advantageous for them. People need to be slaves, and business can't make this possible without appearing to suffer the same fate. Slavery is completely legal and we encourage it every day by buying from walmart. no one will really stand up against it.

0
2

[–] Astrotheologist 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

you got it backwards. People are corporations. Meaning they're legal names represents them as a business (person) and not a human being.

0
1

[–] TerryB 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The definition of the word "person" is not the same in legalese as in common english. Corporations are 'persons'. You have a 'person' if you got a birth certificate. Rabbit hole type stuff to jump into. All about deception.

0
0

[–] Ricky-Spanish ago  (edited ago)

I have never heard anyone in my life say that corporations are people. They are legal entities, not even close to the same thing.

0
1

[–] TerryB 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

'Person' big, big difference in legalese than the common english.

0
2

[–] alele-opathic 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I may be a bit late for visibility, but this needs to be said: you CAN be sold into slavery through mechanisms designed for businesses.

A man by the name of Jeff Baron was placed into equitable civil receivership as recently as 5 years ago by only a small, 2 man conspiracy involving a rogue judge and a lawyer. Civil receivership is where a 3rd party, usually a debtor, wants to recover funds from a host, and has reason to believe the funds they want to recover will be drained before they can begin recovery. It places the entity (usually a business) under the custody of a receiver, which is usually a 3rd party with complete control of the business functions.

This is the first time EVER that a man was placed into civil receivership, and nobody even knows about it. To make the collusion worse, the judge granted his lawyer buddy receivership (!!!, instead of a third party) and the first thing the lawyer did was suspend his first amendment rights (as in, he literally cannot contact anyone). They then proceeded to clean him and his company out for everything they were worth, then the judge retired from the bench.

Here is one link, but there are tons. This is one awareness site.

0
2

[–] captainstrange 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

If money is free speech, why is it illegal for me to have a 'friendly conversation' with my favorite prostitute?

Better yet, if money is free speech, then the IRS compelling me to pay is violating my right to remain silent.

load more comments ▼ (28 remaining)