This is total bullshit. Ask any woman if they could tell the difference between a fake penis and a real one; 100% will say "absolutely".
The "victim" in this case is a lying piece of shit, whoever convicted this woman is a moron.
Also, the "perpetrator" had a shitty lawyer; all she had to say was "I identify as man" - game over.
[–] enverhoxha 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
So the poor ”victim” went to a date with a completely unknown person and accepted to have sex with him/her right away without even seeing him/her! And to think that 30 years ago a woman needed to be courted at length before taking off her panties... Brave new world!
[–] Subarukayak ago
ECC 1:9 ...there's nothing new under the sun.
30 years ago were the coke fueled orgies that led to the HIV fiasco. 40 were bra burners and free love in the back of a van. 50 years were the days of the drive-in.
You damn near have to go back 100 years to the courting days, and even then it was limited to caste and station. Folks have been fucking like rabbits for... well, forever.
[–] barraccuda ago
And in australia, Procuring sexual gratification through deception, usually it is applicable when a guy ripps of a prostitute with fake money or whatever. There is no reasonable excuse to not apply it to traps
[–] culofiesta 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
Isn't this the exact same thing as the movie Boys Don't Cry except people thought that chick was courageous?
[–] ursaggybutt101 ago
Who even agrees to meet someone while blindfolded? Who is THAT desperate???