This is total bullshit. Ask any woman if they could tell the difference between a fake penis and a real one; 100% will say "absolutely".
The "victim" in this case is a lying piece of shit, whoever convicted this woman is a moron.
Also, the "perpetrator" had a shitty lawyer; all she had to say was "I identify as man" - game over.
[–] DILLIGAFASSHOLE ago
using an American man's photographs and videos.
It could've just used it's own pic!
[–] hey_girls_pm_me_toes 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
wtf?
[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
[–] hey_girls_pm_me_toes 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I did and the article and still dont know
[–] hey_girls_pm_me_toes 3 points -1 points 2 points (+2|-3) ago
If you are that dumb you have no right to sue somebody. Also she did agree to sex with her and since gender is a social construct she could say she was a man. if that doesn't work plead insanity
[–] enverhoxha 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
So the poor ”victim” went to a date with a completely unknown person and accepted to have sex with him/her right away without even seeing him/her! And to think that 30 years ago a woman needed to be courted at length before taking off her panties... Brave new world!
[–] Subarukayak ago
ECC 1:9 ...there's nothing new under the sun.
30 years ago were the coke fueled orgies that led to the HIV fiasco. 40 were bra burners and free love in the back of a van. 50 years were the days of the drive-in.
You damn near have to go back 100 years to the courting days, and even then it was limited to caste and station. Folks have been fucking like rabbits for... well, forever.
[–] ursaggybutt101 ago
Who even agrees to meet someone while blindfolded? Who is THAT desperate???