0
0

[–] Approved ago 

I read the article on Wikipedia. It seemed largely accurate, with only a few obvious errors.

The biggest error was where they defined the original right (French who supported the Ancien Regime and monarchy) as a reaction to the left, which defies all common sense, as how can the defenders of the old regime possibly be a reaction to the people who formed to oppose the old regime. It's like claiming eggs were formed as a reaction to omelletes.

Other than that bit of marxist party-line idiocy, the article was mostly accurate.

0
0

[–] WarTracker1776 ago 

Then what is a racist democrat? Lol.

0
1

[–] lord_nougat 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

A stereotype?

They demonstrate their disdain for other races by giving them handouts, as if to strongly imply their inherent helpless weakness! They're the worst racists there are.

0
0

[–] inductive ago 

[citation needed]

Or not, all thats needed is left wing dominance over editing (wars).

"The Free Encyclopedia that anyone can edit" really doesnt mean anything, like the D in DPRK supposedly means Democratic.

0
1

[–] 9827569? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

This is what you get when those on the left control the definitions. It becomes racist to expect two people of different races to both be able to do the same math problem. What do I care if they call me racist under those conditions?

5
-5

0
2

[–] performance 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

What is wrong with racism? Redpill me. I'll wait.

0
0

[–] inductive ago  (edited ago)

I guess you have to start with a multiracial society and define racism as the non-meritocratic treatment of minorites in that society. Here you have a "wrong" experience from the perspective of the minority. This is true equally in societies where you are the minority.

If there is no multiracial society there is nothing wrong with racism in any sense.

Edited

1
8

[–] 9826709? 1 point 8 points (+9|-1) ago 

Wikipedia is infected on all levels by SJW horseshit, and the cretins reinforce each other by playing games with the byzantine ruleset that's in place. Further, you get the individual fiefdoms, pages devoted to trivia that are dominated by some obsessive loon who has opinions they regard as facts. There's also the issue of corporate interests either inserting their own editors or buying existing one to ensure the corporate page is all-positive. Or how about the recursive fact syndrome? Some garbage web post gets cited as fact for wikipedia, some lazy reporter parrots it in lieu of actual research, reporter's article is nowadded to the article footnotes and the original web post is irrelevant.

Wikipedia is a tire fire behind a pleasant facade.

1
-1

[–] gauss_markov 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Unfortunately media will always be dominated by leftists because only they care what other people think. A big part of their ideals are that once everyone is sufficiently (((educated))) there will be a utopia with peace and free shit and nobody has to work.

0
2

[–] StoneRights 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

0
1

[–] HuggableBear 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

right-wing movements with anti-capitalist sentiments including conservatives and fascists who opposed what they saw as the selfishness and excessive materialism inherent in contemporary capitalism.

wut

0
0

[–] Approved ago 

Having greedy penny-pinching merchants control your entire society and culture isn't always a good thing.

Especially when a large percentage of the merchants are... somehow (((different)))... from the base population.

1
2

[–] goat2017 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Laisez faire capitalism was supported by classical liberals, who were of the leftist political tradition. If you go deep enough into paleoconservatism, populism and fascism you end up seeing the anticapitalist arguments from the right.

0
1

[–] inductive 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I dont know why you got downvoted this is perfectly true. Hitler was not lassez faire, populists like trump are not, i dont know enough about paleocons but there is strong right wing/folkish arguments against ancap style capitalism.

load more comments ▼ (5 remaining)