[–] jennyanydots817 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
She doesn't have to fall on anyone, the mere sight of her is a toxic hazard.
[–] Nofatpeople 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
It's clear that the fashion industry isn't comfortable with bodies over a certain size.
I love how they won't refer to them as people.
[–] areallytallguy 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago (edited ago)
[–] thinANDintelligent 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
she's regularly featured in high fashion spaces like Man Repeller
I have no difficulty in believing that she has featured in something about repelling men. And most likely women as well.
Also, she has a "prom dress" on in one of those. That mean there is a market for teenagers sized 24. I'm sure we all knew that from being here, but that is just so depressing a sentence, and it has just been dropped in so casually, as if it is acceptable or something we should just expect and not bat an eyelid to...
[–] Carsandsarcasm 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Life is short.
It certainly is for you.
[–] Balletbitch24 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
There's stretch marks on her shoulders. Her SHOULDERS
[–] mk46gunner 0 points 30 points 30 points (+30|-0) ago
Which is a perfectly acceptable, hell, encourageable, mindset to have in the fashion industry. I see nothing wrong here.
[–] swimfanfan 0 points 24 points 24 points (+24|-0) ago
Totally. No one asks fine artists to display their work in frames from Kmart and set up their exhibitions beside a dumpster.
[–] Skinnyman [S] 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Analogy of the week. Bravo!
[–] trashpandaparty 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I'm sure someone's done this and gotten the Turner prize for it.