[–] [deleted] 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
[–] JohnPaulJones 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago (edited ago)
Setting aside the pizzagate issues, no I don't. I don't think it's fundamentally ethical. The problem is why bother cloning unless you are going to use those clones for something that would not be ethical/legal to do to a normal person; slave labor, organ harvesting, behavioral research or some other thing that we can't imagine yet. I don't mind it within a limited scientific framework (basically can we do it). I don't see a reason why this needs to be pursued on a broad scale and how that could possibly lead to inherently ethical action.
As an aside I have zero issues with tissue cloning and generally think this is where we should be focusing our efforts (basically growing organs for transplant).
[–] [deleted] 1 point 7 points 8 points (+8|-1) ago
[–] Thissandwich 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
I don't remember where I heard this. I can't say that it's true, but rh negative tissue allegedly can't be cloned.
[–] Kill-Commies 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
If it means more aryans.
[–] jew-s-a [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
It would be best to clone the most recessive people so Nordic would be a good one.