[–] [deleted] 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
[–] Kill-Commies 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
If it means more aryans.
[–] JohnPaulJones 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago (edited ago)
Setting aside the pizzagate issues, no I don't. I don't think it's fundamentally ethical. The problem is why bother cloning unless you are going to use those clones for something that would not be ethical/legal to do to a normal person; slave labor, organ harvesting, behavioral research or some other thing that we can't imagine yet. I don't mind it within a limited scientific framework (basically can we do it). I don't see a reason why this needs to be pursued on a broad scale and how that could possibly lead to inherently ethical action.
As an aside I have zero issues with tissue cloning and generally think this is where we should be focusing our efforts (basically growing organs for transplant).
yes at birth with the consent of both parents to deliberately create identical twins or triplets (this would do wonders for scientific studies if twins were more common). yes in the case of cloned donated eggs used for surrogate pregnancies in order to reduce the cost of egg harvesting, especially if they can be frozen and sold (would be nice if it was easy to purchase good genetics in eggs for reasonable prices that lower classes could afford). no for any other type of human cloning.
[–] xenoPsychologist ago
i dont see why not. we should be reaching for the limits of physical possibilities.
[–] Thissandwich 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
I don't remember where I heard this. I can't say that it's true, but rh negative tissue allegedly can't be cloned.
[–] [deleted] 1 point 7 points 8 points (+8|-1) ago
[–] jew-s-a [S] 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
She makes me jizz in her before you stop by so it has some moisture.