0
3

[–] Nermal 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Nermal says over is best, much easier to shred and make a big pile on the floor. https://veuwer.com/i/2pzh.png

0
5

[–] Henrique 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

What are the arguments in favour of under? It doesn't make any sense at all: it's not practical, prettier or anything at all batter than over, which is clearly superior.

0
0

[–] Diavolo1988 ago 

That is exactly what I was going to say. There are no benefits to having under, while over clearly has many benefits. This isn't even a discussion subject.

0
0

[–] Communist_Jesus ago 

In my house, there is acutally a toiletpaperholder (is that what it's called?) that works better if it is under.

0
2

[–] allogonist 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The only argument I have heard is that if you roll it under then cats can't unroll it as easily. This is 50% wrong (the cats just pull on the dangling bit), and 50% evidence that under-rollers are dumber than cats.

As a proud over-roller I use a door to prevent bathroom sabotage so that I can enjoy my butt-paper the way it was meant to be used.

0
2

[–] thehivemind 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The only argument that I have heard is for cat owners, who's cats like to mess with the roll. if it is under, they can't spin the entire roll onto the floor.