[–] Psilocyber 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Swedish women are enjoying the last of their freedom. Soon they are going to be dominated by strong men who will do with them as they please.
It could be native Swedish men (unlikely) who fight off the invaders and then put women in their place or it will be the kebabs, but either way Swedish women will loose their liberty and they will have nobody to blame but themselves.
[–] TAThatBoomerang ago
Swedish women will loose their liberty
How? How would ethno-nationalists cause Swedish women to lose their liberty?
[–] Psilocyber ago
The actual method would remain to be seen. However, it is unlikely that the Swedish men will rise to the occasion.
[–] library_of_stupid 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
That's the really hilarious part about all these leftists. No matter who wins, they lose. If the mudshits and niggers come out on top they'll exterminate the men and enslave the women and do to Sweden what they did to Rhodesia and South Africa, if the right wingers win they'll want their pound of flesh for 70 years of betrayal and ridicule, and, again, the traitorous Western women will have to pay for it, while their numale orbiters get lined up against a wall and executed.
[–] JoeMontana 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Aren't they also a mostly atheist country?
[–] TAThatBoomerang ago
Mostly, but some say that many Swedes have replaced their faith with a pseudo-religion based off political correctness.
[–] JoeMontana ago
There was no dominant religion. The vast majority of people on the world are still religious. It's only logical for something to fill up the vacuum. Also jews run their open borders shit and media and education brainwashing and there you go.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
[–] White-Supremacist 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
https://youtu.be/PkNzYttjSHE To start to understand what is happening you have to understand marxist post modernism. It's a lot to take in.
[–] 8Ball [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Exactly. There are only two genders. So she should've said "woman", but non-man implies that there are many more genders. Insane!