[–] TommyW 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
What's frightening to me is that if someone tells me their position on, say, abortion, I have a pretty good statistical chance of guessing their position on something completely unrelated, say, gun control. Why should one of these topics have any predictive power over the other? Yet they do, because people don't actually bother to think.
[–] Shekelstein6M 1 point 23 points 24 points (+24|-1) ago
Because Hitler's speeches were really good. He mixed the perfect amount of bitter truth with hopeful optimism and dreams.
Just like classical music, some things are just objectively beautiful. Even the jews admit Hitler was a great orator.
[–] JohnCStevenson 3 points -3 points 0 points (+0|-3) ago
Hitler was a monster. It's terrifying how people like you are poisoning the minds of our impressionable youth. Jewish people already have enough issues to deal with in Trump's America.
http://shareblue.com/being-jewish-in-trumps-america-is-a-profoundly-unsettling-reality/
[–] Shekelstein6M ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
[–] White-Supremacist 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
https://youtu.be/VZPZOpFLHVE Great way to help understanding of left and right on the political scale.
[–] 9775607? 2 points 9 points 11 points (+11|-2) ago (edited ago)
Not just that but he was an anti-capitalist Socialist who hated income disparity and the rich. They consistently attempt to paint him as very right wing based solely on his nationalism and race-based policies, but everything else he did outside of those would get huge praise from Bernie Sanders himself.
EDIT: I see the socialists making excuses for their failed ideology are here.
[–] malloryquinn ago
I see the socialists making excuses for their failed ideology are here.
It's ok, we know cucks gotta cuck, and betas need to virtue signal.
What we really need is Islam for 3rd wave feminism. Nazis are always surprised to find out they are Nazis. I'm sure that old book "the wave" has already been banned by progressives
[–] goat2017 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
If your main focus and worldview centers on economic policy, then you're not entirely wrong.
He didn't exactly hate the rich, at least not all of them. Industrialists were fairly well respected, bankers and stock traders not so much. It was the distinction between creating wealth (producing goods or necessary services) rather than managing wealth and extracting wealth (financial services and stock prospecting, etc). But ya, there were extensive social programs for the German people at the time.
[–] Runaway-White-Slave 2 points 2 points 4 points (+4|-2) ago
Idk, Sanders is a Communist hiding behind the veil of Socialism, and although maybe not the most pronounced, there are differences between Communism & Socialism. But then again the American people don't even realize the 10 Planks of the Communist Manifesto have already been played out or implemented in this country, and I don't care whether you're a "Neo-Con" {Neo-Communist is what it actually means}, you live in a Communist U.S.A. straight up, and almost nobody sees it.
Oh and one of the main differences between Communism and Socialism, Communism has failed everywhere, and although it's a little bit of a hybrid here, it's failing here too. At the same time, Hitler's model of Socialism was wildly successful, and that alone is a massive difference.
But Bernnie isn't a Socialist, he's a kike Commie faggot.
[–] 9775806? 3 points 7 points 10 points (+10|-3) ago
Even though there are numerous parties that champion National Socialism in many European nations today, this political ideology was not originally created to meet the needs of people outside the German state. National Socialism was originally meant to build on the special identity of all ethnic German citizens.
...
In nations that embrace socialism, workers are perceived as the real owners of production processes (Eccleshall, 1994). The aim of socialism is to prevent wage labor and production processes from being perceived as commodities. By giving workers the rights to national resources, socialism capitalizes on use value, rather than exchange value (Eccleshall, 1994). National Socialism permits the private ownership of national resources and production processes. In Nazi Germany, foreign corporations like IBM and Ford were not nationalized when Hitler became the Fuhrer. According to Bel (2006), Hitler’s government privatized four banks and several steelwork companies, and gained a lot of revenue by taxing these large corporations (Loughlin, 2001).
While socialism prevents class wars by asserting that no social class of people is more deserving than the other, National Socialism makes use of corporatism to bring together workers and entrepreneurs (Bel, 2006). In nations that embraced National Socialism and socialism, citizens were expected to contribute to state projects on a daily basis. However, this objective was accomplished in different ways.
...
National Socialism and socialism are two different political ideologies that first emerged in the 18th and 19th centuries respectively. Socialism advocates for the equal distribution of wealth across all social classes, while National Socialism is more focused on building pride in the special abilities of the Aryan race, rather than solving the long-standing problem of inequality.
[–] malloryquinn 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Why should they? This is exactly what they want. They are fascists.
[–] TheSoundAndTheFuhrer 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Reminds me of The Office episode when Dwight riles up the salesmen conference by paraphrasing Mussolini.
[–] TerribleTroll 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
OP doesn't know Hitler was far left-wing LOL