[–] chris [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
Its not our job to provide you with actual evidence.
If you're a rational person that understands burden of proof.....yeah, it kinda is your job.
it a code,
obviously?
and unless someone breaks into Jimmycomets house and finds a little code book, we are never going to have anything other than CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence.
Uh...what? I'm asking for evidence that the phrase was a codeword before 4chan created it. What does that have to do with alefantis?
However, there is a HUGE VAST amount of circumstantial evidence and we chose not to ignore it.
Yeah, shitty evidence that rational adults rightly give no credence to.
Once any one of you understands burden of proof, please let me know if you find any evidence that "pizza" is a term that existed before 4chan. Because until then, it's laughable that a 60 year old politician who doesnt understand the internet would be using it. I've given pizzagate subscribers chances to explain the huge gaps in reason that keep me from believing it, but so far I've come up empty handed.
[–] 2impendingdoom ago
people are convicted all the time on circumstantial evidence. If I were I jury, I would convict based on all the gathered info. If you don't like the code, follow the money. How does a pizzaguy get to be the 49th most influential Washingtonian? Like 49th out of all washingtonians? He makes pizzas. That must be some kind of pizza. And your asking us for evidence about an unverifiable code, why not question that tidbit.
Anyway, you aren't going to change anyone here's mind no matter how stupid you call us.
[–] chris [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Why do you see an article from G fucking Q calling him 49th most influential DCer and then just turn that into him actually being the 49th most influential lol. You're referencing a trash magazine.
Anyway, in case you weren't aware he dated David fucking Brock and runs a trendy pizza place in a CIA spook neighborhood, of course he has influence lol