[–] chris [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Like I said, I'm going to watch that documentary, but lets be clear about one thing here: Burden of proof lands on those making the claims. If you're making the claims that it existed before pizzagate (with the exception of CP), then the burden is on you to provide evidence for that claim, and a documentary is not evidence. The evidence the documentary references should be something you have at least verified to exist and should be something you have read and could reference when people ask. How do you know the documentary itself isn't just making things up and referencing evidence that isn't real?