0
0

[–] derram ago 

https://archive.is/egtql | :

AT&T: Forced arbitration isn’t “forced” because no one has to buy service | Ars Technica

'In a statement provided to Ars, he continued using the phrase "forced arbitration" to describe the AT&T customer contract clause. '

'AT&T uses forced arbitration to overcharge customers, senators sayAT&T was responding to concerns raised by Sens. '

'"At the outset, no AT&T customer is ever 'forced' to agree to arbitration," AT&T Executive VP Tim McKone wrote in a letter to US senators today. '

'AT&T is denying that its contracts include "forced arbitration" clauses, even though customers must agree to the clauses in order to obtain Internet or TV service. '

'While AT&T is correct that no one is forced to sign up for AT&T service, there are numerous areas of the country where AT&T is the only viable option for wired home Internet service. '

This has been an automated message.

0
0

[–] palmitespo910 ago 

Yeah but like home internet is a choice, I think is what they are saying. And I'd agree. Kind of fucking rude but definitely like...legally justifiable, right