[–]9659791?2 points
-2 points
0 points
(+0|-2)
ago
This has nothing to do with the credibility of the white house. That's deflection. You're deflecting. CNN is not good. But that has nothing to do with the white house not being credible or having a credible narrative, nor does it mean attacking a news network for being political opponents of the president is an alright thing to do. We keep the standard of the president higher than that. This white house is degrading that standard
[–] 9659791? 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
This has nothing to do with the credibility of the white house. That's deflection. You're deflecting. CNN is not good. But that has nothing to do with the white house not being credible or having a credible narrative, nor does it mean attacking a news network for being political opponents of the president is an alright thing to do. We keep the standard of the president higher than that. This white house is degrading that standard
[–] greenfascist 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
dont think I mentioned the white house.
try again.
to be blatantly clear. I was referencing O'keefe.
He keeps getting it right and the MSM keeps getting exposed for who they are.
[–] Rainy-Day-Dream 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
being quite generous with them