there's two sides to this, only one is presenting evidence for their claims (video evidence at that). Who do you think any reasonable person will side with?
The side "presenting evidence" is being doubted by the people citing his evidence. I think the people can smell that bullshit from a mile away. The guy with "evidence" is known to selectively edit videos and has been sued successfully for doing so. He was found to edit videos in a criminal manner. He is not reasonably credible.
all evidence should meet some doubt that's just basic skepticism. and the rest of that is allegations and slander a longer version of this video is on his website
[–] 9661489? 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
The side "presenting evidence" is being doubted by the people citing his evidence. I think the people can smell that bullshit from a mile away. The guy with "evidence" is known to selectively edit videos and has been sued successfully for doing so. He was found to edit videos in a criminal manner. He is not reasonably credible.
[–] Rainy-Day-Dream 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
all evidence should meet some doubt that's just basic skepticism. and the rest of that is allegations and slander a longer version of this video is on his website