0
1

[–] aria_taint 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

You're completely wrong. The Constitution gives the president that right under 8 U.S. Code ยง 1182 - Inadmissible aliens. It's activist judges that are aligned as basically hating Trump and not following the law but defining the law in there own way and not as it's written.

0
0

[–] ZYX321 ago  (edited ago)

I'm not saying it is. I'm saying it might be, as defined by the supreme court. If they strike it down, it might not be the law itself, just how it became law.

Their motivations aside.

Edit: I looked at the code you mentioned... It's huge. Is there a specific thing in there?

Edit 2:

(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline

Interesting... Now I am invested and will be curious to hear their opinions... The especially interesting part is that it says when "the President finds" that given immigrants are bad. Not that they have to be demonstrably bad. But the "President finds".

0
0

[–] aria_taint ago 

As you can see from your Edit 2 the 9th and 4th circuit court 100% failed to uphold the law. They INTERPRETED TWISTED it to fit there agenda not the law as written. I really hope the SC reverses the lower courts decision but Roberts and Ginsburg are big problems. Ginsburg needs to recuse herself because she was very out spoken during the election as very anti Trump and pro Clinton and Roberts we all know is an agenda driven justice and his agenda is being a shill for the dems.