0
0

[–] Psychanaut [S] ago 

Was Photoshopped, deleted after other Voater pointed this out.

0
0

[–] Lobotomy ago 

Check Photo #6. That's pretty much the picture.

1
-1

[–] wallstreets 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Umm that photo is still in the gallery with full info (which is different from the article). Skippy is fucking evil, but this just makes you look crazy.

0
1

[–] 9462978? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Complete disinfo, the photo with Podesta's head photoshopped in it was never in the photo gallery. Next time you better check archive.org and archive.is first - here is the oldest archived one: http://web.archive.org/web/20161107121633/http://www.politico.com/gallery/2015/07/inside-hillarys-campaign-headquarters-002052?slide=5. Not sure if you are just shilling, but your article sucks.

0
7

[–] BlinkAndUMissIt 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It sucks if they did in fact change something in the article after the fact!

And no doubt it's in his office the painting is in his office: https://i.imgsafe.org/b1a6f2588f.jpg

however, that first picture with JP infront of it was just having him photoshopped over it. True, the picture is in his office and there is another with him sitting at a table near it,but that initial one is photoshopped. I'm referring to this one: original pic as noted in the OP: https://i.imgsafe.org/b09b11ddb9.png you can tell by the way the hair was cut around it, the darker edge around the top of the hair where it was cut out and also between the arm on the left lens, you see the arm of the glasses and a remnant of whatever was behind him that they didn't properly photoshop it out, you can clearly see it when you zoom it, that's why the arm of the glasses looks like an "x" on the first picture. I am an expert photoshop user and lined up the two pictures and changed the layer opacity to illustrate that the angles and light are exactly the same. The only difference is that the picture was mainly lightened that had podesta put on it and cropped it.

Here's a little video I made illustrating this: https://vid.me/rf1a There's a number of places using that same photoshopped photo.

I'm not sticking up for JP nor am I saying the picture isn't in is office or anything like that at all! I'm simply pointing out that this particular image was photoshopped.

AGAIN- I'm simply pointing out that this particular image was photoshopped.

So, they could have removed the pic because it isn't really him in front of it. But it is more likely they did because they are trying to dissociate him from it.

Pic that was actually used to photoshop onto: https://i.imgsafe.org/b1a3880c4f.jpg

0
1

[–] Psychanaut [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

ok...

2
-2

[–] Psychanaut [S] 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

So then how did EU times publish it in their article?

0
2

[–] BlinkAndUMissIt 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Because it's all over the internet. Someone made it and saved it....it was used, viewed, saved and reused and so on and so on.

infowars has it...etc. https://www.infowars.com/art-depicting-cannibalism-hangs-in-podestas-campaign-office/

google search

screenshot of the search link: https://i.imgsafe.org/b222931314.png

but you get the idea.

Again, not disputing the art doesn't exist or that JP isn't suspect or anything at all....simply noting that the image was photoshopped.

0
0

[–] The_Crux ago 

What's funnier is that their security was so lax that they put up a large cardboard sign telling the last one to leave the building to set the alarm code to #2. So everyone who walked through there knows how to break into that building and walk out with all their computers.

0
0

[–] Spy_Banking ago 

2 likely means "leave" instead of "stay" which likely arms motion sensors in addition to doors alone which is likely #1. The disarm code is most likely different.

0
0

[–] The_Crux ago 

Okay. I don't know anything about alarm systems so it looked funny to me. Your explanation sounds more likely.

0
0

[–] The_Crux ago 

Link to the scrubbed version.

0
2

[–] The_Crux 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It's right there still. #6. Did they just un-edit it after you posted?

0
1

[–] rooting4redpillers 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Still there, yes - the office, minus Podesta's head Photoshopped in. The caption clearly states it's Podesta's office, and brings attention to the "decor."

Campaign chairman John Podesta's office offers a little more decor. -- Annie Karni / POLITICO

0
1

[–] 9462961? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Not even minus the head. There's eight versions in The Wayback Machine, I only checked the oldest: there never was a photo with Podesta photoshopped in it, and it would have been very odd in that compilation of pictures too - http://web.archive.org/web/20161107121633/http://www.politico.com/gallery/2015/07/inside-hillarys-campaign-headquarters-002052?slide=5

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)