0
7

[–] BlinkAndUMissIt 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It sucks if they did in fact change something in the article after the fact!

And no doubt it's in his office the painting is in his office: https://i.imgsafe.org/b1a6f2588f.jpg

however, that first picture with JP infront of it was just having him photoshopped over it. True, the picture is in his office and there is another with him sitting at a table near it,but that initial one is photoshopped. I'm referring to this one: original pic as noted in the OP: https://i.imgsafe.org/b09b11ddb9.png you can tell by the way the hair was cut around it, the darker edge around the top of the hair where it was cut out and also between the arm on the left lens, you see the arm of the glasses and a remnant of whatever was behind him that they didn't properly photoshop it out, you can clearly see it when you zoom it, that's why the arm of the glasses looks like an "x" on the first picture. I am an expert photoshop user and lined up the two pictures and changed the layer opacity to illustrate that the angles and light are exactly the same. The only difference is that the picture was mainly lightened that had podesta put on it and cropped it.

Here's a little video I made illustrating this: https://vid.me/rf1a There's a number of places using that same photoshopped photo.

I'm not sticking up for JP nor am I saying the picture isn't in is office or anything like that at all! I'm simply pointing out that this particular image was photoshopped.

AGAIN- I'm simply pointing out that this particular image was photoshopped.

So, they could have removed the pic because it isn't really him in front of it. But it is more likely they did because they are trying to dissociate him from it.

Pic that was actually used to photoshop onto: https://i.imgsafe.org/b1a3880c4f.jpg

2
-2

[–] Psychanaut [S] 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

So then how did EU times publish it in their article?

0
2

[–] BlinkAndUMissIt 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Because it's all over the internet. Someone made it and saved it....it was used, viewed, saved and reused and so on and so on.

infowars has it...etc. https://www.infowars.com/art-depicting-cannibalism-hangs-in-podestas-campaign-office/

google search

screenshot of the search link: https://i.imgsafe.org/b222931314.png

but you get the idea.

Again, not disputing the art doesn't exist or that JP isn't suspect or anything at all....simply noting that the image was photoshopped.

0
1

[–] Psychanaut [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

ok...

1
14

[–] dickface888 1 point 14 points (+15|-1) ago 

We should demand an answer from someone at Politico, hound them until they acknowledge it.

0
1

[–] 9462987? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

No, we should demand that Psychanaut do his homework, because the photo was never in, as the archive shows: http://web.archive.org/web/20161107121633/http://www.politico.com/gallery/2015/07/inside-hillarys-campaign-headquarters-002052?slide=5

EDIT: I can't believe so many people upvoat this and even go nearly mad and demanding this and that without even checking the facts. It's beyond stupid.

2
3

[–] Psychanaut [S] 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

Good Idea actually. Really good. Damn, they are fucking removing content on the live web. insane.

0
0

[–] Takeitslow ago 

1984

1
11

[–] dickface888 1 point 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

Dodgy shit like this happens at such a rapid rate that we lose track and get distracted by the next fucked thing. Imagine if we had a solid compilation of the posts like this pointing out the blatant, undeniable coverups. It's all here too on this website, just needs to be compiled and weaponized.