Well-called. You're right: it's solely an emotional, sensationalist comment and opinion, lacking any data, research, or facts, or even a mere slightest allusion to the comment having been derived based off data, research, or facts. Just an emotional opinion and comment.
Unfortunately, we've become so desensitized to the constant bombardment of "information" and shear magnitude of data to process and remember daily, especially from our "side" (either side honestly), that we can no longer even parse simple language and the real value of the words we're being given. That comment is blatantly just an inflammatory comment, without anything at all behind it except essentially a "journalist", and an editor, both of which are presumably highly-politically biased in USA in 2017, of course.
Well, I was wondering if the shills were going to scrap the 'muh Russia' narrative. I guess we have our answer, they'll continue to beat the dead horse into a pulp.
You keep purposefully repeating this charge to everybody who criticises your bullshit narrative. The President is/was under investigation for treason, so I think it highly unlikely "the shills" are the ones pointing out that it's a bit strange you keep pretending he isn't doing anything wrong. Trump claimed he was going to "drain the swamp" and then staffed his cabinet with Goldman Sachs executives, fossil fuel representatives and the immediate family members of the billionaire Zionist Jew who financed his political campaign. Calling people "shills" for pointing this stuff out just torpedoes your own credibility -- and rightly so.
[–] Impulsive 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
Shit source probably written by a feminist. Why do I say this? Emotional headline.
[–] Dr_Shekel_Nigger 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Well-called. You're right: it's solely an emotional, sensationalist comment and opinion, lacking any data, research, or facts, or even a mere slightest allusion to the comment having been derived based off data, research, or facts. Just an emotional opinion and comment.
Unfortunately, we've become so desensitized to the constant bombardment of "information" and shear magnitude of data to process and remember daily, especially from our "side" (either side honestly), that we can no longer even parse simple language and the real value of the words we're being given. That comment is blatantly just an inflammatory comment, without anything at all behind it except essentially a "journalist", and an editor, both of which are presumably highly-politically biased in USA in 2017, of course.