0
1

[–] Chiefpacman [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Groups of Jews began to arrive in Surinam in the middle of the seven-teenth century, after the Portuguese regained control of northern Brazil. By 1694, twenty-seven years after the British had surrendered Surinam to the Dutch, there were about 100 Jewish families and fifty single Jews there, or about 570 persons. They possessed more than forty estates and 9,000 slaves, contributed 25,905 pounds of sugar as a gift for the building of a hospital, and carried on an active trade with Newport and other colonial ports. By 1730, Jews owned 115 plantations and were a large part of a sugar export business which sent out 21,680,000 pounds of sugar to European and New World markets in 1730 alone.

They basically Dutch Atlantic trade. That's about 33 pounds of sugar for every human alive at that time, with the estimate of about 700 million people.

0
1

[–] 0110001111 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Ironic that Jews berate white people for the slave trade, only to find out they were possibly the largest owners of slaves in that time period. Having a slave at the time was expensive, to the tune of thousands, and you still needed to give it food, housing, shelter. Not only that, slave ownership at the time meant transference of liability, so you became liable for your slaves' actions. If he broke something, or god knows what, it was all on you to pay for it and make amends. Most important of all, it was white, non Jewish people who went to war to free these slaves. Funny how none of these points are ever mentioned in history classes.

0
0

[–] kamtsa ago 

Chiefpacman, does it mean that you are against the black slave trading in the new world?

We may agree on something.

1
0

[–] Chiefpacman [S] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

I am

Did we argue recently or something?

0
1

[–] 1Sorry_SOB 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

This is from a Jewish magazine

http://www.jta.org/2013/12/26/news-opinion/world/dutch-rabbi-confronts-jews-with-ancestors-complicity-in-slavery

“Money was earned by Jewish communities in South America, partly through slavery, and went to Holland, where Jewish bankers handled it,” he said. “Non-Jews were also complicit, but so were we. I feel partly complicit.”

0
1

[–] 1Sorry_SOB 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

0
1

[–] 1Sorry_SOB 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

"Oh look the anti-semites are at it again, bringing up Jews involved in slavery."

Why do we do it? We wouldn't even mention it if you learned about it in high school.

Here is the red pill. Since the 1960's, American History was switched away from glorifying our past to a more (((accurate))) warts and all approach. And now it's about making white people ashamed of our history. This in effect leaves us defenseless to advocate for ourselves

Our Fellow White, Howard Zinn (Jew) is well known for offering whites this type history to high school students. In these revisions there is never anything negative said about blacks or Jews. They are always victims of whites. Why is that? I'm sure that Zinn is well aware that during the prohibition era the majority of those involved in organized crime and murder for hire were Jews, not Italians. Just like the Russian mafia was primarily Jewish.

We bring these things to your attention so that you have a better understanding of the history that has been hidden from you. We are pushing back on the people that live among us and treat us as enemies and try to hurt us.