[–] 9321832? 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
We're working hard to get you mugs arguing stupid things instead of the points that you used to be focused on. Remember when Amalek was a bad name around here and now you're all 1488? Yeah, that's us muddying your waters. We'll have you all on the moral lowground and those that aren't will be doxxed and publically shamed by association. That's just how we roll. Suckers.
[–] 9321700? [S] 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
check /v/new to see what I'm talking about. /u/split is extra active. possibly /u/chelseasPIZZA. /u/EatMyFacts. /u/realdontrump is really active. /u/themagicman.
[–] 9322551? ago (edited ago)
Has there ever been a confirmed shill on Voat? It seems even more thinly sourced than Trump-Russia collusion. Just paranoiacs dreaming stuff up and then acting as if it is a given in subsequent discussions.
[–] 9322610? [S] ago
Most of the rantier shill accusations strike me as clearly nutty. Anything related to voat drama such as SBBH or to a somewhat lesser degree PV is almost assuredly BS as well.
However, there is a clear group of posters you can only really find in /v/new because they get downvoated so hard who actively try to unredpill people with posts consisting of a combination of fake news, biased reporting, and narrative pushing.