Fuck their arbitrary standards based on their feelings.
That could be said of yours as well.
I said they are a statistical, scientific aberration. Undeniable, not my emotional opinion.
But do people not have the right to be aberrations? Even if that's true, it's not a justification for persecuting them. They haven't committed a crime; they've done nothing wrong. They may not be virtuous, productive people, but they've never harmed anyone.
And I'm not sure where you were going with that last part... Victims deserving compensation is not an immature or idealistic delusion. If someone punches you in the face without consent, they've committed a crime and owe you a debt. It's a simple and fundamental concept in justice. So my point was, in the context of homosexuality, who is the victim? If Bob and Bill blow each other then who has committed a crime (and what is it)? Who is the victim there?
[–] cynicaloldfart ago (edited ago)
You're a whiny little idiot. You aren't going to change reality with all your emotions, feelings, and inclusiveness bs. Quit being a pussy expecting life to be fair and somebody owes you when life gets in your face. I have a feeling you'll always be a victim.
[–] Charlez6 ago
What are you talking about? One of us is arguing based on arbitrary feelings, that's for sure. If you have a consistent, valid argument for how homosexuality is a moral crime I'd love to hear it.
And why would I be a victim? Where did that come from? You're not making any sense.