[–] [deleted] 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago (edited ago)
[–] kittysaysmeownow 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Two scoops of the same flavor is like two men though...
[–] frankenmine 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
But they're a company. They can do whatever the fuck they want. They can even refuse to cater ice cream to gay weddings.
... wait a minute...
[–] NSFW_LeeLee 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
It'd be ever so fucking nice to see the day businesses stop politicizing consumer dollars. Fuck that overpriced bullshit.
[–] [deleted] 1 point 6 points 7 points (+7|-1) ago (edited ago)
[–] olinneserpona 1 point 9 points 10 points (+10|-1) ago
I know this isn't fascism, but whats funny is that under fascist corporatism businesses have to be on the states side. They have to support the fascist ideology or not harm the ideology - "Everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state". When liberal businesses make a political stand, as many of them do, they are doing exactly what a fascist state would expect from them, only they do do it in the name of Liberalism.
[–] ScreaminMime 0 points 14 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago
Shouldn't it be the opposite? Requiring two scoops to be the same?
[–] GoogleHatesVoat 3 points 3 points 6 points (+6|-3) ago
It's anti Trump, not anti-fag. They are banning white traditional marriage. Two scoops of vanilla and a scoop of chocolate? Just fine by SJWs, anything to dilute the white race.
[–] 0b01000101 2 points 2 points 4 points (+4|-2) ago
This is such pointless self-defeating logic....
[–] lord_nougat 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Now THAT is difficult to forgive!
Thanks for reminding me why I stopped buying that stuff again!
[–] Sellyoulight 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
B&J just made the “Never Again” List that I put Starfucks on a while ago.
[–] barraccuda 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
These people are retarded, same sex marriage is already legal, its called a civil union. They are just having a cry because the naming conventions are different. Fuck off and die you bunch of cunts
[–] teatime 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Devils Advocate - I have no idea what Australian law is like, but perhaps it's a case of separate but equal?
[–] Popsquat81 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
No. It is would be more of a case of semantics. All of the wedded partnerships are civil unions, it is the church that called it marriage. As most legal and court systems were based, in the old days, on religious systems, the name stuck.
Edit: Clarity