[–] HarlandKornfeld14 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
If think that would lead to unnecessarily crowded threads. I don't like to comment in crowded threads.
[–] Thisismyvoatusername [S] ago
Do you object to log that shows you voated up or down?
[–] HarlandKornfeld14 ago
I don't think it's necessary. Normally it's pretty easy to spot those employing voat manipulation, they normally aren't very smart or subtle.
[–] VIP740 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Not a bad idea. Without context, I would simply interpret an upvoat to mean 'I agree', and a downvoat to indicate disagreement. It may just be more convenient to click the arrow, rather than type a reply that will only clutter the thread with redundant comments. I'm with you on making the identity of the voters transparent though.
[–] Thisismyvoatusername [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
What do you think about making the voaters known? Should they be hidden?
Added benefit is it would be hard to hide bots or shills if we knew how/when/how fast they voated.
[–] MeGrimlock4 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Every post:
"cool" "interesting" "nice" "comment to upvoat" "upvoat" "upvoat comment"