1
0

[–] Cheesebooger 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

(((They're))) desperate to get the world tax scheme going.

0
3

[–] lettersofmarque 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Not so surprising. Anyone who's ever been forced to take a social science class at college soon realizes the bases for all of it is the fashionable interpretation of ambiguous data. When your grade doesn't depend on analysis of the subject but rather the regurgitation of professor bias, you know you ain't in a "science" class anymore.

0
0

[–] mudbear ago 

Realized this fairly early doing a year of psychology, was very disappointed

0
3

[–] TheNimbleHamburgler 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

People should do this more often. Every issue of those journals should include a retraction of a hoax. Humanities have become a joke by people who want to seem smart but are too dumb for science.

0
0

[–] skyjazzcat ago 

So much of academia is just using clever sounding obscure language, and nothing more. How is this hoax any different to any other articles in this journal.

0
0

[–] apoptosis15 ago 

Cogent Social Sciences

kek